BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
C.C.No.182 of 2016
Between:
Sri Rama Krishna Musunuri,
Aged about 45 years,
Son of Sri Sivaji Musunuri,
Occ: Business,
Residing at D.No.11-12-24,
R.R.Appa Rao Street,
Beside Rajakumari Theatre,
Vijayawada – 520 001, A.P. India.
Rep. by his SPA Holder Sri M.Narendra.
…Complainant
And
1. Audi India Private Limited,
Office No.3, North Avenue, Level 3,
Maker Maxity, Bandra Kurla Complex,
Bandra East, Mumbai – 400 051.
Rep. by Audi India Head Mr.Joe King.
2. Mr.Joe King,
Head – Audi India Private Limited,
Office No.3, North Avenue, Level 3,
Maker Maxity, Bandra Kurla Complex,
Bandra East, Mumbai – 400 051.
3. M/s.Olympus Motors,
(Audi Cars Distributor)
Road No.12, Banjara Hills,
Hyderabad – 500 034, Rep. by
Executive Director Mr.Rajeev Sanghi.
4. M/s.Olympus Motors,
24 to 31, Survey No.34,
Madhapur Gram Panchayat,
Lingampally, RR District, Hyderabad – 500 051.
Rep. by Service Manager.
…Opposite Parties No.1 to 4
Counsel for the Complainant : M/s.V.Gourisankar Rao, Advocate
Counsel for the Opposite Party No.1 & 2 : Notice returned
Counsel for the Opposite Party No.3 & 4 : M/s.M.Papa Reddy, Advocate
QUORUM: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA, PRESIDENT
MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY,
TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN. .
Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri. B.N.Rao Nalla, President).
***
This complaint is filed under section 17 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying this Commission:
a) To provide a new Audi Q5 quat car to Complainant by bearing all the expenses such as road tax and insurance apart from the invoice value of the car;
b) To compensate the Complainant from January 2015 for a sum of Rs.1,09,517/- per month being EMIs paid by the Complainant by keeping car bearing registration number AP 16 CW 0558 with Respondents 3 and 4 till date of passing order;
c) To pay Complainant an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- towards damages for causing mental agony, pain, stress and financial loss;
d) To pay Complainant an amount of Rs.52,470/- from January, 2015 to till date of decree, being the amount spent by my client for alternative car usage taken on rent;
e) To pay Complainant the costs of case.
Counsel for the Complainant and counsel for Opposite Party No.3 & 4 are present. They informed the Commission that the Complainant filed settlement memo on the previous date of hearing i.e., 27.01.2017. Both sides requested the Commission to record the same and basing on the said memo wherein it was prayed for permission to withdraw the complaint as the matter has been settled out of court.
In the circumstances the memo is ordered permitting the Complainant to withdraw the complaint. Hence the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.
PRESIDENT MEMBER
Dt.20.02.2017
