Telangana

StateCommission

CC/110/2013

B.Anantha Reddy, S/o. Padma Reddy, (Late) Aged about 55 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. Villa-150, Indu Fortune Fields, KPHB, Phase-III, Hyderabad. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Andhra Pradesh State Housing Board (APHB), Situated at Gruhakalpa, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad- - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. K. Yadhagiri Reddy

19 Dec 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
Complaint Case No. CC/110/2013
( Date of Filing : 27 Jun 2013 )
 
1. B.Anantha Reddy, S/o. Padma Reddy, (Late) Aged about 55 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. Villa-150, Indu Fortune Fields, KPHB, Phase-III, Hyderabad.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1. Andhra Pradesh State Housing Board (APHB), Situated at Gruhakalpa, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad-500 001. Rep. by its GPA Holder M/s. The CHIDC
2. (Cyberabad Hitech Integrated Township Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd.,) Rep. by its Managing Director,
Having its Registered Office at 1009, Phase-XIII, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500 072.
3. 2. M/s. Cyberabad Hitech Integrated Township Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd.,(CHIDCO), Rep. by its Managing Director, Mr. I. Syam Prasad Reddy,
Having Registered Office at 1009, Phase XII, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500072.
4. 3. Mr. I Syam Prasad Reddy S/o. Late Venku Reddy, Aged about 55 Years, Occ: Business,
R/o. 30, Whisper Valley, H.s.Darga Hyderabad-500 008.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. K. Ramesh JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 19 Dec 2018
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION OF TELANGANA (Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) AT HYDERABAD

 

C.C.NO.110 OF 2013

 

Between:

 

B.Anantha Reddy S/o Padma Reddy (late)

Aged about 57 years, Occ: Business,

R/o Villa-150, Indu Fortune Fields,

KPHB, Phase-III, Hyderabad.

…Complainant

 

          And

 

1)       Andhra Pradesh State Housing Board

          (APHB), Rep. by its Vice-Chairman-cum-

Managing Director, situated at

Gruhakalpa, M.J. Road,

          Nampally, Hyderabad – 500 001,

          Rep. by its GPA holder M/s the CHIDCO

          (Cyberabad Hitech Integrated Township

          Development Corporation Pvt., Ltd.,)

          Rep. by it Managing Director,

          Having its registered office at 1009,

          Phase-XIII, Kukatpally, Hyderabad – 500 072.

 

2)       M/s Cyberabad Hitech Integrated Township

          Development Corporation Pvt., Ltd., (CHIDCO),

          Rep. by its Managing Director,

          Having at registered office at 1009,

          Phase-XIII, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500 072.

 

3)       I.Syam Prasad Reddy

          S/o late Venku Reddy,

          Aged about 55 years, Occ: Business

R/o 30, Whisper Valley, H.S.Darga,

          Hyderabad – 500 008.

 

4)       Telangana Housing Board

          Rep. by its Vice-Chairman-cum-

          Managing Director, situated at

Gruhakalpa, M.J. Road,

          Nampally, Hyderabad – 500 001.

…Opposite parties

         

Counsel for Complainants        :         Sri K.Yadagiri Reddy

Counsel for Opposite Parties    :         Sri V.Gouri Sankara Rao-R2 & R3

                                                            Sri D.Vijayender Rao-R4

 

          This is a complaint filed under Section 17(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to direct the Opposite parties to register the flat in the name of the Complainant bearing flat No.40306 situated in the 3rd floor, East facing OLIVE block, admeasuring 1865.36 sft., “Indu Fortune Fields (Gardenia)” in survey No.1009, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, R.R. district by collecting the  balance amount of Rs.3,76,133/- and deliver possession of the said flat; to complete the incomplete works in said flat such as flooring, finishing work, sanitary works, fixing of doors and windows and several common amenities, etc.,; to pay Rs.5,00,000/- towards the mental agony, hardship and serious inconvenience; to pay Rs.30,000/- towards costs of the complaint.

 

QUORUM:

Hon’ble Sri Justice M.S.K. Jaiswal                President

and

Sri K.Ramesh                    Member

 

Wednesday, the Nineteenth day of

December, Two thousand Eighteen

 

Oral Order :

***

 

          Counsel for the Complainant and Opposite parties present.  Both the Complainant and the Opposite parties have filed a joint memo to the effect that the matter has been settled out of court and hence permission is sought for withdrawing the complaint.  Accordingly permission accorded and the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.

 

 

 

 

PRESIDENT                     MEMBER

 

Dated 19.12.2018

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. K. Ramesh]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.