ORAL ORDER

Per – Hon’ble Mr. V. P. Utpat, President

          None present for the Complainant even on second call.  Today, Complainant failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  So, was the position on even on previous date viz. 17/11/2016.  Complainant has not only failed to appear before this Forum but also failed to make out a sufficient good case for admission of consumer complaint.  Thus, it does appear that Complainant is no longer interested in further prosecution of present consumer complaint.  Hence, consumer complaint is not admitted and stands dismissed for want of prosecution as per provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000.  No order as to costs.

Pronounced on 03^rd January, 2017