Maharashtra

Pune

CC/16/640

श्री. रबिंद्र प्रसाद - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.सौ प्राची अजय भूते - Opp.Party(s)

08 May 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PUNE AT PUNE
NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, 04TH FLOOR, B-WING
OPP. COUNCIL HALL, NEAR SADHU WASWANI CHOWK,
PUNE - 411001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/640
 
1. श्री. रबिंद्र प्रसाद
रा. C of K . K. Kadam सरला अपार्टमेंट खडकेश्व.र Flat No. 10 Aurangabad
Aurangabad
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1.सौ प्राची अजय भूते
मेसर्स कल्याणी डेव्हलपर्स 524 सदाशिव पेठ बिझीलॅंड बिल्डींग पुणे 30
2. 2.श्री.अजय गोवींद भूते
मेसर्स कल्याणी डेव्हलपर्स 524 सदाशिव पेठ बिझीलॅंड बिल्डींग पुणे 30
3. 3.साईप्रभा गोविंद मेनन
मेसर्स कल्याणी डेव्हलपर्स 524 सदाशिव पेठ बिझीलॅंड बिल्डींग पुणे 30
4. 4.श्री.सचिन मुकुंद जगताप
पॅरामाउंट रिअॅलीटीज अ.सेफग्रोथ मिडीया हाउस प्रा .ली.चौथा मजला .मॉर्डन शाळे समोर टेंबे हॉस्पी टल शिवाजीनगर पुणे 05 ब .ऑफिस नं. 1.पहिला मजला अर्जुन हाईटस डॉ. आंबेडकर चौक वारजे माळवाडी पुणे
5. 5.श्री.मधुर सुरेश भोसले
पॅरामाउंट रिअॅलीटीज अ.सेफग्रोथ मिडीया हाउस प्रा .ली.चौथा मजला .मॉर्डन शाळे समोर टेंबे हॉस्पी टल शिवाजीनगर पुणे 05 ब .ऑफिस नं. 1.पहिला मजला अर्जुन हाईटस डॉ. आंबेडकर चौक वारजे माळवाडी पुणे
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENT
  Kshitija Kulkarni MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 08 May 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Final Order / Judgement

Common Oral Order in Consumer Complaint No.457 of 2016 + Consumer Complaint No.582 of 2016 + Consumer Complaint No.583 of 2016 + Consumer Complaint No.640 of 2016

Today, when all these complaints were called for hearing, none present for the Complainants even on second call.  Today Complainants failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  Perusal of the order-sheet reveals that so was the position even on previous three adjourned dates viz. 28/10/2016, 19/12/2016 and 09/03/2017.  Not only this but also for the reasons best known to the Complainants, Complainants also failed to lead their evidence as contemplated under Section-13(2)(b)(ii) read with Section-13(4) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in compliance with earlier order dated 26/08/2016.  Thus, in such peculiar circumstances, it does appear to this Forum that Complainants have lost their interest in further prosecution of these consumer complaints.  In such circumstances, it is not desirable to prolong these cases.  Hence, these consumer complaints stands dismissed for want of prosecution in accordance with the provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000.  Parties shall bear their own costs.

Pronounced and dictated on Monday, 08th May, 2017

 
 
[ V. P. UTPAT]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Kshitija Kulkarni]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.