Orissa

Khordha

CC/288/2012

Damodar Moharana. - Complainant(s)

Versus

(1) The R.M., Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., Bhubaneswar. - Opp.Party(s)

Sri K.C. Prusty.

31 Jul 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CDR FORUM, KHURDA
KHANDAGIRI, BHUBANESWAR, 751030
 
Complaint Case No. CC/288/2012
( Date of Filing : 11 Sep 2012 )
 
1. Damodar Moharana.
At-Plot No- 1406/822, Laxmisagar, BBSR.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. (1) The R.M., Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., Bhubaneswar.
Lewis Road, BBSR.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sri K.C. Prusty., Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Sri S.M. Dwibedy and Associates. , Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 31 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KHURDA,

BHUBANESWAR

 

 

C.D.CASE NO.  288/ 2012

 

Damodar Moharana, aged about 42 years,

S/o – Lokanath Moharana, At : Plot No.1406/ 822, Laxmisagar (Talasahi),

PO- Laxmisagar, Bhubaneswar, Dist : Khurda

                                                                                                            …        Complainant

            -Vrs.-

 

1.         Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd.

            Lewis  Road, Bhubaneswar, Dist : Khurda

Represented through  its Regional Manager.

 

2.         Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd.,

            123, Angappa Naicken Street, Chennai – 600001,

            through its Managing Director

 

                                                                                                            ….       Opp.    Parties            

 

EXTRACT OF THE ORDER NO.40: DATED-  31/07/2023 (Later)

***

 

Perused the copy of the arbitration award.  Damodar Moharana,  who is complainant in this case, was the OP  in the Arbitration Proceeding.  The vehicle bearing registration number OR-05-T-2380, is involved in both the proceedings.  Arbitration Award was passed on 31/01/2022 and the Complaint was filed before this Commission on 11/09/2012.  The proposition of law in this regard is crystal clear that,  as and when an award has been passed by  the sole arbitrator in respect of the same cause of action,  a complaint petition is not maintainable before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. In view of the said legal proposition, this Consumer Complaint is not maintainable, as such the case is dismissed. 

 

Sd/-Member (W)                                                                     Sd/-  President

(S.Tripathy)                                                                             (K.C.Rath)

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY.]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.