Orissa

Khordha

CC/49/2020

Sumitra Chhotray. - Complainant(s)

Versus

(1) The Managing Director, TATA MOTORS Finance Ltd., Mumbai. - Opp.Party(s)

Sri K.C. Mohanty and Associates.

29 May 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CDR FORUM, KHURDA
KHANDAGIRI, BHUBANESWAR, 751030
 
Complaint Case No. CC/49/2020
( Date of Filing : 29 Feb 2020 )
 
1. Sumitra Chhotray.
W/O- A.K. Chhotyray, At- Aseli, Po- Lendo, Ps- Nirakarpur, Dist-Khurda-752019.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. (1) The Managing Director, TATA MOTORS Finance Ltd., Mumbai.
106 A, and 106 B, 10th floor, Maker Chamber, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021.
2. (2) The Branch Manager, Tata Motors Finance Ltd., Bhubaneswar.
At-Keshari Talkies Complex,1st floor,P.O/P.S.- Kharavel Nagar,Unit-3,Bhubaneswar-751001, Dist- Khurda.
3. (3) The Managing Director, Consortium Automobiles Pvt. Ltd.
Plot No-644.645,646,647, NH-5, Pahala, Bhubaneswar, Dist-Khurda.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

DIST.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KHURDA, BHUBANESWAR:

                                                                  -ooOoo-

 

C.D. CASE NO. 49/2020

 

Sumitra Chhotray, aged about 35 years, W/o –  Akshya Kumar Chhotray , At –  Aseli,

PO: Lendo, PS- Nirakarpur Dist – Khordha.

….       Complainant

-Vrs.-

 

1.         TATA MOTORS FINANCE LTD., Regd. Office - 10th Floor,

106 A & B, Maker Chamber, III,Nariman Point, Nanavati, Mumbai – 400 021,

           

2.         TATA MOTORS FINANCE LTD., At :  1st Floor, Keshari Talkies Complex, 98,

            Kharavela Nagar, Unit – III, Bhubaneswar – 751001.

 

3.         Consortium Automobiles Pvt.Ltd., TATA MOTORS, represented by its\

            General Manager, Dealer Light Commercial Vehicle, Plot No.644/2148, 645, 646 & 647,

Pahal, NH-5, Bhubaneswar – 752101, Dist – Khordha, Odisha.

                                                                                                                        ….       Opp. Parties   

 

 EXTRACT OF THE ORDER NO.10: DATED: 29/05/2023

***

 

The record is put up today. Complainant is found absent. OPs 1 & 2 are also absent.  A/R for the OP.3 is present. Perused the copy of the arbitration award filed earlier on behalf of the OPs.    Sumitra Chhotray, who is complainant in this case, was the OP in the Arbitration Proceeding.  The vehicle bearing registration number  OD-02-AQ-7738  is involved in both the proceedings.  Arbitration Award was passed on 30/11/2019  and the Complaint was filed before this Commission on  29/02/2020.  The proposition of law in this regard is crystal clear that,  as and when an award has been passed by  the sole arbitrator in respect of the same cause of action,  a complaint petition is not maintainable before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. In view of the said legal proposition, this Consumer Complaint is not maintainable, as such the case is dismissed. 

 

Sd/-Member (W)                                                                     Sd/-  President

(S.Tripathy)                                                                             (K.C.Rath)

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY.]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.