DIST.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KHURDA, BHUBANESWAR:
-ooOoo-
C.D. CASE NO. 63/2020
Rakesh Ranjan Pattnaik, aged about 44 years,
S/o – Rabindra Kumar Swain, At/PO- Pahal, PS – Balianta, Dist – Khurda
…. Complainant
-Vrs.-
1. TATA MOTORS FINANCE LTD., Nanavati, Mahalaya, 3rd Floor,
18, Homi Mody Street, Mumbai – 400 001, Through its Managing Director.
2. TATA MOTORS FINANCE LTD.,
At : Plot No.98, Keshari Talkies Complex, 1st Floor,
PO/PS: Kharavela Nagar, Unit – III, Bhubaneswar – 751001,
Dist : Khurda, Through its Branch Manager.
3. R.T.O., Cuttack At/PO/PS/ Dist – Cuttack.
…. Opp. Parties
EXTRACT OF THE ORDER NO.11: DATED: 26/05/2023
***
Perused the copy of the arbitration award. Rakesh Ranjan Pattanaik, who is complainant in this case, was the OP in the Arbitration Proceeding. The vehicle bearing registration number OD-05-X-6221, is involved in both the proceedings. Arbitration Award was passed on 31/01/2018 and the Complaint was filed before this Commission on 16/03/2020. The proposition of law in this regard is crystal clear that, as and when an award has been passed by the sole arbitrator in respect of the same cause of action, a complaint petition is not maintainable before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. In view of the said legal proposition, this Consumer Complaint is not maintainable, as such the case is dismissed.
Sd/-Member (W) Sd/- President
(S.Tripathy) (K.C.Rath)
