Orissa

Khordha

CC/225/2023

Satyabrata Das. - Complainant(s)

Versus

(1) The M.D., Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Mumbai. - Opp.Party(s)

Sri K.C. Prusty.

07 Aug 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CDR FORUM, KHURDA
KHANDAGIRI, BHUBANESWAR, 751030
 
Complaint Case No. CC/225/2023
( Date of Filing : 26 Jun 2023 )
 
1. Satyabrata Das.
S/o- G. Das, At- Chourasi, Po- amareswar, Ps- Nimapara, Dist-Puri.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. (1) The M.D., Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Mumbai.
36-38A, Nariman Bhavan, 227, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021.
2. (2) The B.M., Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Bhubaneswar.
Plot No- 184, Janpath,At/Po- Kharavel Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Dist-Khurda
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sri K.C. Prusty., Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Sri A.B.Majhi ., Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
 Sri A.B. Majhi ., Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 07 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DIST.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KHURDA, BHUBANESWAR:

                                                                 -ooOoo-

 

C.C. CASE NO.225/2023

 

Satyabrata Das,  aged about 43 years,

S/o – Gouranga Das, C/o-  Gouranga Das,

At- Chourasi, PO- Amareswar, PS- Nimapara, Dist- Puri, Pin – 752120

….       Complainant

-Vrs.-              

 

  1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.,

At – 36-38A – Nariman Bhawan, 227, Nariman Point

Mumbai – 400021, Through its Managing Director.

 

  1. Branch Manager, KOTAK MAHINDRA Bank  LTD.,

At - Plot  No.184, Janpath, Kharvela Nagar, Bhubaneswar – 751001.

 

                                                                                                            ….       Opp. Parties

 

 EXTRACT OF THE ORDER NO.04: DATED: 07/08/2023

***

 

Perused the copy of the arbitration award. Satyabrata Das,  who is complainant in this case, was the OP  in the Arbitration Proceeding.  The vehicle bearing  registration number OD-02-BK7929,  is involved in both the proceedings.  Arbitration Award was passed on 30/09/2022 and the Complaint was filed before this Commission on 26/06/2023.  The proposition of law in this regard is crystal clear that,  as and when an award has been passed by  the sole arbitrator in respect of the same cause of action,  a complaint petition is not maintainable before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. In view of the said legal proposition, this Consumer Complaint is not maintainable, as such the case is dismissed. 

 

Sd/-Member (W)                                                                     Sd/-  President

(S.Tripathy)                                                                             (K.C.Rath)

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY.]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.