Orissa

Khordha

CC/142/2023

Sanjukta Premguru. - Complainant(s)

Versus

(1) The M.D., Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Mumbai. - Opp.Party(s)

Sri K.C. Prusty.

16 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CDR FORUM, KHURDA
KHANDAGIRI, BHUBANESWAR, 751030
 
Complaint Case No. CC/142/2023
( Date of Filing : 25 Apr 2023 )
 
1. Sanjukta Premguru.
W/o- R. Premguru, Village- Jimadei, Po- P N College, Khordha.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. (1) The M.D., Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Mumbai.
At-36-38 A, Nariman Bhawan, Mumbai.
2. (2) The B.M., Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Bhubaneswar.
At-Plot No-184, Janpath, BBSR.
3. (3) The ARTO,.Khordha.
Khurdha,
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sri K.C. Prusty., Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Sri A.B.Majhi ., Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
 Sri A.B. Majhi ., Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 16 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

 

 

 

 

DIST.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KHURDA, BHUBANESWAR:

                                                                 -ooOoo-

 

 

C.C. 142/2023

Sanjukta Paramaguru, aged about 62 years,

W/o – Rabinarayan Paramaguru, Village – Jemadei, PO- P.N. College,

Khordha, PS/ Dist – Khordha - 752057

….       Complainant

-Vrs.-

 

  1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD., At- 36-38A- Nariman Bhawan, 227,

Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400021, Through its Managing Director.            

 

  1. Branch Manager, KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.,

Plot  No.184, Janpath, Ground Floor,

Kedarson Building, Bhubaneswar – 751001,

 

  1. ARTO., Khordha, PO/PS/Dist- Khordha

                                                                                                            ….       Opp. Parties

 

 EXTRACT OF THE ORDER NO.05: DATED: 16/06/2023 (Later)

***

 

Perused the copy of the arbitration award. Sanjukta Paramaguru, who is complainant in this case, was the OP in the Arbitration Proceeding.  The vehicle  bearing registration number OD-02-AV-6921, is involved in both the proceedings.  Arbitration Award was passed on 16/05/2023 and the Complaint was filed before this Commission on 25/04/2023.  The proposition of law in this regard is crystal clear that,  as and when an award has been passed by  the sole arbitrator in respect of the same cause of action,  a complaint petition is not maintainable before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. In view of the said legal proposition, this Consumer Complaint is not maintainable, as such the case is dismissed. 

 

 

Sd/-Member (W)                                                                     Sd/-  President

(S.Tripathy)                                                                             (K.C.Rath)

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY.]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.