Orissa

Khordha

CC/337/2014

Sunil Parida. - Complainant(s)

Versus

(1) The B.M., Magma Fincorp Limited. Bhubaneswar. - Opp.Party(s)

Sri K.C. Prusty.

06 Feb 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CDR FORUM, KHURDA
KHANDAGIRI, BHUBANESWAR, 751030
 
Complaint Case No. CC/337/2014
( Date of Filing : 12 Nov 2014 )
 
1. Sunil Parida.
S/o- P.K. Parida, Plot No- 20/203, Delta Colony, Po/Ps- Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. (1) The B.M., Magma Fincorp Limited. Bhubaneswar.
At- Nirmal Plaza, A1, Forest Park, Bhubaneswar.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sri K.C. Prusty., Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 06 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DIST.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KHURDA, BHUBANESWAR:

 

C.D.No. 337 of 2014

 

Sunil Parida, aged about 25 years,

S/o  - Pramod Kumar Parida, Plot No.20-203, Delta Colony,

PO/PS- Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar, Dist – Khurda

                                                                                                             ………Complainant.

-Vrs.-

                                                                                                                                

 

  1. MAGMA  FINCORP.  LIMITED, 

At : Nirmala Plaza,  A1, Forest Park,

Bhubaneswar - 751002,  Dist- Khurda, through its   

Branch  Manager

 

  1. MAGMA  FINCORP.  LIMITED, 

Regd. Office- 24, Park Street,

Kolkata-700016., through its Managing Director.

 

 

….       Opp. Parties

 

EXTRACT OF THE ORDER NO.42 : DATED: 06/02/2023

****

 

Advocate for the complainant is present. OPs are absent. On perusal of case record, I find that, there is a certified copy of the arbitration award in connection with this case.  Sunil Parida, who is the complainant in this case, was a party  before the Arbitration Proceeding. The arbitration award has been  passed on 07/03/2014. The complaint was filed before this Commission on  12/11/2014 i.e. after passing the arbitration award.  The proposition of law in this regard is crystal clear that,  as and when an award has been passed by  the sole arbitrator in respect of the same cause of action,  a complaint petition is not maintainable before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. In view of the said legal proposition, this Consumer Complaint is not maintainable, as such the case is dismissed. 

 

Sd/-Member (W)                                                                     Sd/-  President

(S.Tripathy)                                                                             (K.C.Rath)

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY.]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.