Nepal Panda filed a consumer case on 03 Aug 2022 against 1-superintending Engineer in the Sambalpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/47/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 04 Aug 2022.
PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SAMBALPUR
Consumer Case No-47/2018
Present-Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, President,
Sri. Sadananda Tripathy, Member,
Nepal Panda,
S/O-Late Nursingha Panda,
At- Goutam Vihar, Bhima Bhoi Nagar,
PO-Budharaja,Ps-Ainthapali,
Dist- Sambalpur-768004, Odisha. …..Complainant
Vrs.
WESCO, Burla.
No.1, Sub Division, WESCO,
Ainthapali, Sambalpur. …..….Opp. Parties
Counsels:-
DATE OF HEARING : 29.06.2022, DATE OF JUDGEMENT :03.08.2022
Presented by Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, PRESIDENT.
After several request the officials of O.Ps inspected and stated that “the meter found tampered by injection liquid inside the meter to Vanish the display.” The meter was intact and seal was intact. The officials of O.Ps tool the meter and prepared a calculation sheet for consumption of 5965W with 6KW load charging Rs. 25,961.30P for the period Nov. 2015 to July, 2016. The house was not rented and given on rent only on 17.07.2016. The officials took the electrical apparatus of the tenant for calculation on 01.08.2016 as per the application of leased accommodation of LIC Housing Finance Ltd. The inspecting officer prepared an inspection report giving without date to manipulate and to charge excessive consumption bill.
To avoid disconnection and with protest the Complainant paid Rs. 20,000/- vide receipt No. A 9 2926007 dated 22.08.2016 and Rs. 5000/- vide receipt No. A9-2926118 dated 27.09.2016. The Complainant paid Rs. 1600/- vide receipt No. A9-2926021 dated 25.08.2016 as cost of meter. Rs. 50/- for meter has not been tested nor any certificate has been provided.
The O.P. No.1 alleged that the meter has been tampered in Dec. 2016 although it is totally operated by the officials. The Letter No. 1288 dated 27.12.2017 alleging a penalty of Rs. 25,961.30P as meter tampered is illegal. The Complainant further alleged that the O.Ps are deficient in service for which the complaint is filed.
@2KW from Dec. 2015 to July 2015,
@4KW from July 2015 to August 2015 and directed to finalize the bill.
The Complaint on 26.09.2016 made a complaint to install new meter and on 14.12.2017 requested to refund the excess charges taken.
The Complainant entered in to rent agreement with one Satyabrata Panda through LIC Housing Finance Ltd. On 20.06.2016 and the lessee entered in to the rental house on 17.07.2016 as it reveals from the packers and Movers receipt dated 17.07.2016.
Letter No. 1288 dated 27.12.2017 of the O.P. NO.2 discloses that Rs. 1600/- has been collected against cost of meter and meter serial No. WVS 13339 was supplied to the Complainant.
The Complainant has paid the following amount to the O.Ps to-wards electricity bill.
05.12.2015 Rs..322.00
25.01.2016 Rs. 322.00
22.03.2016 Rs. 802.00
28.04.2016 Rs, 349.00
22.05.2016 Rs. 350.00
27.05.2016 Complanint No. CSC 14602
20.06.2016 Rs. 347.00
22.08.2016 Rs. 20,000.00
27.09.2016 Rs. 5,000.00
25.08.2016 Rs. 1600.00
18.07.2016 Rs. 350.00
28.09.2016 Rs. 1120.00(installation charges)
28.09.2016 Rs. 1500.00
From the above payment details it reveals that the customer/Complainant has regularly paid the electricity charges. The Complaint against defective meter was made by CSC 14602 dated 27.05.2016. The calculation sheet does not contain date of the officer who directed to calculate penalty, Bill shown till July 2016. After complaint by the Consumer before installing the new meter in September 2016 the assessment was made. The Inspection report does not contain any date it proves the malafide of the O.Ps.
The Complainant as a sensible customer agitated the matter several times. Here question arises complaint was made on 27.05.2016, the meter was installed separately for tenant, paid Rs. 50/- for meter testing on 27.04.2017 (CSC-15559) but the meter was not tested.
From the aforesaid facts and circumstances it is clear that to patch the lacunas the O.Ps have shown a false inspection report having without date and alleged that the meter is tempered although it was sealed, imposed penalty of Rs. 25,961.30P on the Complainant. The deficiency in service is proved against the O.Ps
Accordingly it is ordered:
The complaint is allowed ex-parte against the O.Ps. The O.Ps are directed to refund Rs. 25,961.00 with 9% interest w.e.f. 25.08.2016 within one month failing which the amount will carry 12% interest P.A till realisation.
The O.Ps are further directed to give the meter testing report against complaint (CSC-15559) within one month to the Complainant and a compensation of Rs. 40,000/- within one month failing which the amount will carry 12% interest P.A. till realisation.
The O.Ps are directed to pay Rs. 10,000/- litigation expenses.
Order pronounced in open court on this 3rd day of August 2022.
Supply free copies to the parties.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.