Orissa

Khordha

CC/454/2010

Sk. Mehtabuddin, - Complainant(s)

Versus

(1) Shriram Group of Company. - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Rakesh Sahoo and Associates.

31 May 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CDR FORUM, KHURDA
KHANDAGIRI, BHUBANESWAR, 751030
 
Complaint Case No. CC/454/2010
( Date of Filing : 27 Oct 2010 )
 
1. Sk. Mehtabuddin,
S/o- Late S.K. Raffiuddin, At- 35/A, Syed Amir Ali Venue, Calcutta. West Bengal.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. (1) Shriram Group of Company.
Bapuji Nagar, Bhubaneswar.
2. (2) Shriram Finance Transport Co. Ltd., Kolkata.
Turner Morisson Building, Kolkata.
3. (3) Inspector In Charge, Badachana.
Jajpur.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

DIST.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KHURDA, BHUBANESWAR:

                                                                -ooOoo-

 

C.D. CASE NO. 454/ 2010

 

Sk. Mehtabuddin, aged about 42 years,

S/o Late  Sk. Raffi Uddin, residing at 35/A, Syed Amir Ali Avenue,

Dist – Calcuttaa- 7000178, West Bengal.

                                                                                                            ….       Complainant

-Vrs.-

 

1.         Shriram Group of Company, Bapuji Nagar,

Bhubaneswar,  At : Geetanjali Complex, Near Ravi Talkies Square, Lewis Road

            Bhubaneswar, Dist : Khurda

 

2.         Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., Turner Morrison Building,

            1st Floor,  6 Lyons Range, Kolkata – 700001

 

3.         Inspector In-charge, Badachana P.S., Jajpur. 

….       Opp. Parties

 

 

 EXTRACT OF THE ORDER NO.84: DATED: 31/05/2023

***

 

Perused the copy of the arbitration award. Sk. Mehtabuddin, who is complainant in this case, was the OP in the Arbitration Proceeding.  The vehicle bearing registration number  OR-05-V-0706,  is involved in both the proceedings.  Arbitration Award was passed on 20/09/2014  and the Complaint was filed before this Commission on  27/10/2010.  The proposition of law in this regard is crystal clear that,  as and when an award has been passed by  the sole arbitrator in respect of the same cause of action,  a complaint petition is not maintainable before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. In view of the said legal proposition, this Consumer Complaint is not maintainable, as such the case is dismissed. 

 

Sd/-Member (W)                                                                     Sd/-  President

(S.Tripathy)                                                                             (K.C.Rath)

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. SUBHALAXMI TRIPATHY.]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.