View 1176 Cases Against Videocon
Yugal Prasad Shroff (Dead) filed a consumer case on 30 Aug 2022 against 1- The Videocon D2H Orissa NOdal Officer in the Sambalpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/29/2019 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Aug 2022.
PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SAMBALPUR
Consumer Case No- 29/2019
Present-Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, President,
Sri. Sadananda Tripathy, Member,
S/O-Late Yugal Prasad Shroff
D/o- Late Yugal Prasad Shroff
S/O- Late Yugal Prasad Shroff
D/o- Late Yugal Prasad Shroff
All R/O- Sunaripara, Barabazar,
Po/Ps- Khetrajpur, Dist-Sambalpur, Odisha. ………..…..Complainant
Vrs.
1- The Videocon D2H Orissa Nodal Officer
At- Videocon D2H Limited, A/60, BJB Nagar,
1st floor Bhubaneswar-751014
2- M/s. Dish TV India Ltd.
FC-19, Sector 16A, Film City, Noida,
Uttar Pradesh, India, PIN-201301
3-The CEO Dish TV India Ltd
FC-19, Sector 16A, Film city, Noida,
Uttar Pradesh, India, PIN-201301
4-The managing Director Dish Tv India Ltd.
FC-19, Sector 16A, Film city, Noida,
Uttar Pradesh, India, PIN-201301. .. ………..Opp. Parties
Counsels:-
DATE OF HEARING :13.07.2022, DATE OF JUDGEMENT : 30.08.2022
Presented by Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, PRESIDENT,
The case of the complainants is that on 14.12.2018 recharge of Rs. 2650/- Gold life pack was made in advance for one year. Rs. 219/-per month for 12 months Rs. 2628/- and Rs. 22/- extra. On 12.04.2019 the complainant surprised that that star pack and sony pack channels are deleted from his pack and it displayed, “channel subscription Ka hissa nohi hai etc.” complaint was made on same day but the O.Ps did not resolve the problem.
The Complainant when reviewed the Balance details in d2h account found that “End of subscription date 25.12.2019.” The subscription was abridged for the period 25.12.2019 to 10.01.2020 for 15 days without any intimation.
The Complainants logged complaint on 13.04.2019, 08.05.2019 and 14.05.2019 but neither resolved the problem nor refunded the amount.
The claim is totally denied and the Complaints are not entitled for any relief.
After several correspondence of the complainants the O.Psremained silent and not given any reply, it amounts to deficiency in service of the O.Ps.
Accordingly it is ordered:
The complaint is allowed partly against O.P. No.2 to 4. No order can be passed against O.P. No.1 as it is merged with O.P. No.2 to 4. The O.P. No.2 to 4 are directed to pay compensation of Rs. 25,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs. 5000/- within one month of this order, failing which the entire amount will carry 7% interest w.e.f. 11.06.2019 date of filing till realisation.
Order pronounced in open court on this 30th day of August, 2022.
Supply free copies to the parties.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.