ORAL ORDER

Per – Hon’ble Mr. V. P. Utpat, President

          None present for the Complainant even on second call.  Today Complainant failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  Perusal of the order-sheet reveals from time to time as per request and convenience of the Complainant, the consumer complaint for adjourned for hearing on the point of admission.  However, inspite of seeking repeated adjournments, Complainant has failed to prima-facie make out a sufficient good case for admission.  Thus, it does appear to this Forum that Complainant has lost his interest in further prosecution of present consumer complaint.  In such circumstances, it is not desirable to prolong the case.  Hence, consumer complaint is not admitted and stands dismissed in limine for want of prosecution, in accordance with the provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000.  No order as to costs.

Pronounced on 24^th April, 2017