Maharashtra

Pune

EA/16/177

श्री.विवेक शंकर कायंदे - Complainant(s)

Versus

एव्हीएस AVS कॉम्युटर टेक्नॉलॉजीस - Opp.Party(s)

29 Apr 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PUNE AT PUNE
NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, 04TH FLOOR, B-WING
OPP. COUNCIL HALL, NEAR SADHU WASWANI CHOWK,
PUNE - 411001
 
Execution Application No. EA/16/177
In
Complaint Case No. CC/15/394
 
1. श्री.विवेक शंकर कायंदे
1.81 नंदन अपार्टमेंट उजवे भुसारी कॉलनी पौडरोड कोथरुड कोथरुड पुणे 38
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. एव्हीएस AVS कॉम्युटर टेक्नॉलॉजीस
177 सोमवारपेठ नवीन अपार्टमेंट विरुध्दर नागेश्वकर मंदिर पुणे महाराष्ट्र 411011
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENT
  Kshitija Kulkarni MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 29 Apr 2017
Final Order / Judgement

COMMON ORAL ORDER IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.177 OF 2016 + EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.07 OF 2017

Per – Hon’ble Mr. V. P. Utpat, President

          Since both these execution proceedings involve same parties, identical facts and are arising out one and same order dated 31/03/2016 passed by this Forum partly allowing Consumer Complaint No.394 of 2015, both these execution proceedings are clubbed together are disposed of by this common order.

[2]     Execution Application No.177 of 2016 is filed by original Complainant, under Section-27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  Whereas, Execution Application No.07 of 2017 is filed by original Complainant, under Section-25 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

[3]     Today when both these cases are called out, none present for the Complainant/Decree-holder.  Today Complainant/Decree-holder failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  Mr. Aslam Mistry, in person is present on behalf of the Accused/Judgment-Debtor.  On behalf of the Accused/Judgment-Debtor a statement is made across the Bar to the effect that Accused/Judgment-Debtor has fully complied with the order put for execution and pursuant thereto Accused/Judgment-Debtor had issued to the Complainant/Decree-holder, a cheque for an amount in sum of Rs.35,583/-.  Today, Mr. Aslam Mistry, representing the Accused/Judgment-Debtor, has produced on record Bank Statement issued by Bank of Maharashtra to show that bank has honoured said cheque and amount thereof has been released in favour of the Complainant/Decree-holder.  Thus, representative of the Accused/Judgment-Debtor has prima-facie satisfied this Forum that order put for execution in both these proceedings has been fully complied with.

[4]     Consequently Execution Application No.177 of 2016 as well as Execution Application No. 07 of 2017 hereby stands disposed of as fully satisfied. Parties shall bear their own costs.

Pronounced on Saturday, 29th April, 2017

 
 
[ V. P. UTPAT]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Kshitija Kulkarni]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.