ORAL ORDER

Per – Hon’ble Mr. V. P. Utpat, President

          This consumer complaint is not yet admitted and today it is listed before this Forum for hearing on admission.  Today, when the case was called out, even on second call, Complainant failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  Perusal of the order-sheet reveals that so was the position even on previous date viz. 18/04/2017.  Thus, Complainant has failed to prima-facie make out a sufficient good case for admission.  Further, in view of absence of the Complainant, it does appear to this Forum that Complainant has lost his interest in further prosecution of present consumer complaint.  In such circumstances, it is not desirable to prolong the case.  Hence, consumer complaint is not admitted and stands rejected in limine for want of prosecution in accordance with the provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000.  No order as to costs.

Pronounced and dictated on Friday, May 05, 2017