Maharashtra

Pune

CC/15/803

श्री संजय शंकर जगताप - Complainant(s)

Versus

मे.लोखंडे कन्ट्रंक्श्न - Opp.Party(s)

अॅड.तरळे

16 Mar 2017

ORDER

PUNE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM
PUNE
Shri V. P. Utpat, PRESIDENT
Shri Onkar G. Patil, MEMBER
Smt. K. B. Kulkarni, MEMBER
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/802
 
1. सौ.अनिता संजय जगताप
सि.टी. सर्व्हेe नं.1333 व 1334 कसबा पेठ पुणे 411 002
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. मे.लोखंडे कन्ट्रक्शन
404 नारायण पेठ पुणे 30 तर्फे प्रोपा्रायटर श्री.हनुमंत भगवान लोखंडे रा.एकता सोसायटी म्हाडा कॉलणी सदनिका क.12 पहिला मजला शिवतीर्थ नगर पौड रोड कोथरुड पुणे 38
2. श्री.शिवाजीनगर सोपानराव पायगुडे
सि.टी. सर्व्हेु नं.1333 कसबा पेठ पुणे 411 002.
3. श्रीमती.इंदूमती शंकर पवळे
सि.टी. सर्व्हेु नं.1333 व 1334 कसबा पेठ पुणे 411 002
4. श्री.प्रसाद शंकर पवळे
सि.टी. सर्व्हेु नं.1333 व 1334 कसबा पेठ पुणे 411 002
............Opp.Party(s)
Complaint Case No. CC/15/803
 
1. श्री संजय शंकर जगताप
सि.टी. सर्व्हेर नं.1333 व 1334 कसबा पेठ पुणे 411 002
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. मे.लोखंडे कन्ट्रंक्श्न
404 नारायण पेठ पुणे 30 तर्फे प्रोपा्रायटर श्री.हनुमंत भगवान लोखंडे रा.एकता सोसायटी म्हा0डा कॉलणी सदनिका क.12 पहिला मजला शिवतीर्थ नगर पौड रोड कोथरुड पुणे 38
2. श्री.शिवाजीनगर सोपानराव पायगुडे
सि.टी. सर्व्हेु नं.1333 कसबा पेठ पुणे 411 002.
3. श्रीमती.इंदूमती शंकर पवळे
सि.टी. सर्व्हेु नं.1333 व 1334 कसबा पेठ पुणे 411 002
4. श्री.प्रसाद शंकर पवळे
सि.टी. सर्व्हेु नं.1333 व 1334 कसबा पेठ पुणे 411 002
5. Mr.Smrat Ashok Karwa
481 C Shaniwar Peth Pune 411 030
6. Mrs.Kalpana Ashok Karwa
481 C Shaniwar Peth Pune 411 030
7. Shri.Rahul Ganesh Ladhe
481 C Shaniwar Peth Pune 411 030
8. Mr.Utkarsh Balasaheb Patil
481 C Shaniwar Peth Pune 411 030
9. Mrs.Triveni Ganesh Ladhe
481 C Shaniwar Peth Pune 411 030
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENT
  Kshitija Kulkarni MEMBER
  Onkar G. Patil MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 16 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Common Oral Order in Consumer Complaint No.802 of 2015 + Consumer Complaint No.803 of 2015

In both these consumer complaints none present for the parties even on second call.  Today Complainants failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  Perusal of the order reveals that Complainants were absent even on previous date viz. 27/12/2016.  Complainants have also failed to lead evidence as contemplated under Section-13(2)(b)(ii) read with Section-13(4) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; by filing their affidavits in compliance with earlier order dated 17/11/2016 passed by this Forum.  Thus, in these peculiar circumstances, it does appear to this Forum that Complainants have lost their interest in further prosecution of present consumer complaints.  Hence, it is not desirable to prolong these cases.  Consequently, both these consumer complaints stands dismissed for want of prosecution in accordance with provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000.  Parties shall bear their own costs.

Pronounced on Thursday, March 16, 2017

 
 
[ V. P. UTPAT]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Kshitija Kulkarni]
MEMBER
 
[ Onkar G. Patil]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.