Address: Near Judicial Complex, Jagadhari, Yamuna Nagar
Email ID: complaints@consumercourt.in
Website: https://www.consumercourt.in/
Real Estate | Housing Board | Construction| Builder| Property
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Bhupinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR AT JAGADHRI. Complaint No. 402 of 2015. Date of institution:06.11.2015 Date of decision: 22.07.2016.Raghubir Singh aged about 42 years son of Shri Chandu Ram, resident of VPO Bhampol, Yamuna Nagar, Tehs...
Case Number: 402
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate H.Aneja
Respondant Advocate Sarvjeet Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No… 837 of 2011. Date of institution: 05.08.2011 Date of decision: 22.07.2016M/s Cable Connect Technologies, E-52, Industrial Area, Yamuna Nagar, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar, throug...
Case Number: 837
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Complainant Inperson
Respondant Advocate
Kesho Ram vs. Sony ndiaEx.No. 12 of 2016.Present: Sh. Kesho Ram, DH in person. Sh. Kesho Ram DH made a statement that compliance of Forum’s order dated 24.12.2015 has been fully made and he withdraws the present execution petition being fully satisfied, which may be filed. ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Ex. No. 132 of 2014.Naveed Madhra vs.Mahendiratta Music World.Present: None for DH. Today the case was fixed for filing of correct address being last opportunity. Case called several times since morning. It is 3.30 P.M. but none appeared on behalf of the DH. From the perusal of...
Case Number: 132
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Kulwant Singh
Respondant Advocate
CC No.243 of 2016.Rani Devi vs. Social Welfare.Present: Sh. Kulwant Singh, Advocate, counsel for complainant. Report of Superintendent perused. Complaint be checked and registered. However, counsel for the complainant made a statement that there is some technical defect in the p...
Case Number: 243
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Sanjay Dhiman
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Singhal
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR AT JAGADHRI. Complaint No. 315 of 2015 Date of Institution: 27.08.2015 Date of Decision: 21.07.2016.Rohit Kumar aged about 30 years son of Sh. Ramesh Chand, R/o Village Gobindpuri, Tehsil Jagadhri, Dist...
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Karam Singh
Respondant Advocate Naveen kaushal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 43 of 2013. Date of institution: 14.01.2013. Date of decision: 21.07.2016Mohd. Asgar aged 55 years son of Sh. Nek Mohd. resident of Village Bombepur, Post Office Khizrabad, Tehsil Chhachhrauli, D...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Harvinder Aneja
Respondant Advocate Sachin Bhardwaj Op No.1,G.S.Manipur OP No.2
CC No.1068 of 2006.Kuldeep Kumar vs. Sangam Coop. Society.Present: Complainant in person with counsel Sh. Harvinder Aneja, Adv. Sh. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate, counsel for OP No.1. Sh. G.S.Manipur, Advocate, counsel for OP No.2. Complainant made a statement that there is some te...
Case Number: 1068
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Amit Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Sudesh Kumari vs. Lal’s Computerised.CC No. 167 of 2015.Present: Sh. S.S.Kamboj, Advocate, counsel for complainant. Sh. Harinder Kumar, Advocate, counsel for OPs. Counsel for the complainant made a statement that he does not want to pursue the present complaint, which may...
Case Number: 167
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2016
Consumer Court: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Pankaj Verma
Respondant Advocate Sumit Gupta
Parmod Kumar vs. Bhalla CommunicationEx.No. 42 of 2016.Present:Sh Pankaj Verma, Advocate, counsel for DH. Sh. Sumit Gupta, Advocate, counsel for JDs No.2 & 3. Counsel for the DH made a statement that he has received a cheque bearing No. 769744 dated 24.06.2016 amounting to R...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.