company-name-logo

Consumer Court in StateCommission

Latest Judgments

List of Consumer Court case in StateCommission. Total 347 cases registered in StateCommission Consumer Court.

Tripura

President Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co.Ltd. V/S M/S Chandimata Food Products

Bajaj Allianz   Bajaj Allianz   Food   Bajaj  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Sankar Bhattachrya, Mr. Bidyut Nath, Smt. Jayeeta Bhattachrya

Respondant Advocate Mr. Utpal Das, Mr. Karnajit De, Miss R. Purakayastha.

Today the matter is fixed for cross-examination of the complainant witnesses.Three witnesses, namely, Sri Arjun Roy, Sri Biplab Das and Sri Pradip Kr. Das have appeared on behalf of the complainants.Heard Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Ld. Counsel appearing for the complainants as well as...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 07-01-2021

Tripura

Smt Moumita Roy. V/S The Chief Postmaster General

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Biswanath majumder

Respondant Advocate Mr. Debal Saha

Tripura State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Agartala.Case No. A.8.2020The Chief Postmaster General,Director Postal Services,Delhi Circle, New Delhi - 110001.The Chief Postmaster General,Assam Circle, Guwahati Head Post Office,Guwahati G.P.O. GMC, Kamrup,Assam - 781001.T...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 22-12-2020

Tripura

The Branch Manager, HDFC Banl Ltd. V/S Mr. Ajoy Krishna Paul

Hdfc  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. P. Roy Barman, Mr. K. Nath, Miss. A. Debbarma, Miss. N. Ghosh

Respondant Advocate Mr. M.K. Arya

Tripura State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Agartala.Case No. A.7.2020Ajoy Krishna Paul,S/o Late Akhil Krishna Paul,C/o: M/s Radha Rani Stores,R/o: Netaji Subhash Road, AgartalaP.S. West Agartala, District: West Tripura,Pin: 799001.… … … … Ap...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2020

|

Date of Upload: 03-11-2020

Tripura

M/S Star Enterprise V/S Shri. Niharendu Debnath

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Kajal Nandi

Respondant Advocate

Today the matter is fixed for hearing.Mr. K. Nandi, Ld. Counsel appears for the appellant-complainant submits that he wants to withdraw the appeal.On the other hand, even after substitute service of notice, none appears on behalf of the respondent-opposite party.In view of the ab...

Case Number: 40

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2019

|

Date of Upload: 19-10-2020

Tripura

M/S Laxmi Telecom V/S Nabakumar Das

Telecom  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate Mr. A Das

Tripura State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Agartala.Case No.A.6.2020Shri Nabakumar Das,S/o Sri Narayan Ch. Das,Kamalghat Opposite of ICFAI University,Mohanpur, Tripura,Agartala, West Tripura, Pin - 799210.… … … … Appellant/Complainant.VsThe ...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 21-03-2020

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2020

Tripura

Sri. Somit Majumder, V/S Sri. Snigdhendu Bikas Dey

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Kajal Nandi

Respondant Advocate Mr. S. Dutta Choudhuri

The instant Execution Case is filed by the decree holder-complainants, Shri Snigdhendu Bikash Dey and Smt. Smriti Dey against Sri Samit Mazumder, Managing Director of M/s Eastern India Business Associates Pvt. Ltd. for compliance of order dated 16.09.2019 which is as follows:-&ld...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-2019

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2020

Tripura

Sri. Rana Pratap Nath Bhaumik V/S The Chairman, Bata India Limited.

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. P.K. Debnath

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 14-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2020

Tripura

The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd. V/S Sri. Ashu Ranjan Debbarma

United India Insurance  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Haribal Debnath, Mrs. Uma Chanda, Mr. Dripta Pritam Ghosh

Respondant Advocate Mr. P. Gautam

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2020

Tripura

Sri. Manojit Saha V/S Big Bazaar

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Suman Bhattacharya

Respondant Advocate

Tripura State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Agartala.Case No.A.1.2020Big Bazaar,Ground Floor, 1st and 2nd floor,Below: Rupasi Cinema Hall,Mantri Bari Road, Agartala,West Tripura, Pin - 799001.… … … … Appellant/Opposite Party.VsShri Manojit Sa...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 20-06-2020

Tripura

Smt. Kajal Rani Jamatia V/S The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd.

United India Insurance  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. R. Purkayastha

Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Saha, Mr. S. Lodh

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-06-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

What is the Consumer Forum?

Consumer Forum StateCommission, also known as the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum of StateCommission - Tripura, is established to protect consumer rights and provide a swift and cost-effective solution for consumer complaints. Consumer Forum StateCommission provides a platform for consumers of StateCommission - Tripura to file complaints against unfair trade practices by the seller, any type of defect in products, or deficient services. There are three levels of Consumer Forum – District Forum i.e StateCommission, State Forum i.e. State Commission consumer forum, and National Forum, each with varying jurisdictions. The main purpose of StateCommission consumer forum is to safeguarding consumers' interests and promoting ethical business practices by holding companies accountable for any violations of consumer rights.

Who can file a complaint before a StateCommission Consumer Forum?

In general, any consumer who has purchased goods or availed any service for the personal use can file a complaint before a StateCommission Consumer Forum.

Defination of Consumer in THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019

(7) "consumer" means any person who—

(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other than the person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or partly paid or partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such use is made with the approval of such person, but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any commercial purpose; or

(ii) hires or avails of any service for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such service other than the person who hires or avails of the services for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person, but does not include a person who avails of such service for any commercial purpose.

Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause,—
(a) the expression "commercial purpose" does not include use by a person of goods bought and used by him exclusively for the purpose of earning his livelihood, by means of self-employment;
(b) the expressions "buys any goods" and "hires or avails any services" includes offline or online transactions through electronic means or by teleshopping or direct selling or multi-level marketing;

What type of cases can be filed in Consumer Forum?

If you have any disputes and grievances related to your purchase of goods or services and the company is not solving your problem even after filing complaint to the customer care, you can file case against that company in Consumer Forum.

Defective Goods : Consumer can file cases if the purchased goods are defective, substandard, or not as described.

Deficient Services : Complaints regarding services that are deficient or not as promised.

Unfair Trade Practices : Unfair trade practices such as misleading advertisements, false representations, or deceptive business practices.

Overcharging or Unjust Pricing : Complaints related to overpricing, price manipulation, or charging more than the specified.

Faulty Products : Issues arising from products that are unsafe to use, pose health hazards, or do not meet safety standards.

Delay in Services : Cases where there is an unreasonable delay in providing services, causing inconvenience to the consumer.

Product Liability : Instances where a product causes harm or injury due to design defects, manufacturing defects, or inadequate warnings.

Unsatisfactory Professional Services : Disputes arising from services provided by professionals such as doctors, architects, etc.

E-commerce Transactions : Complaints related to the online purchases, including non-delivery of item, quality, or non-compliance with terms and conditions.

What is the procedure of filing the case in StateCommission consumer Forum

When you have not received any satisfactory response from the seller even after contacting to their customer care or even submitting your complaint in anyway, the next step is to file your case in the StateCommission consumer Forum. Before filing a case, you need to send a Legal Notice to the opposite party for dispute resolution. If there's no response or resolution within the stipulated time, you can file your case in the StateCommission consumer Forum.

What is the time limit for filing a case in StateCommission Consumer Forum?

As per THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 , The District Commission, the State Commission or the National Commission shall not admit a complaint unless it is filed within two years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen.