Xiaomi
Latest Judgments
Total 690 Consumer Court Cases Against Xiaomi.
Xiaomi India V/S Mr. Navneet Lunayach
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
Before the Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 221 OF 2016Navneet LunayachVs Xiaomi India and others BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBER ASHOK RAJ BHANDARI, MEMBE...
Case Number: 221
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Director of Xiaomi Pvt Ltd V/S Sushil S/o Sudhirrao Tambe
Court Name: Aurangabad
Appelant Advocate Adv
Respondant Advocate Adv
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2016
M/s Xiaomi India V/S Mandeep Singh
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 24/08/2016ORDER Sh. Mandeep Singh, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty ...
Case Number: 621
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
XIAOMI Inc. V/S Gaurav Kumar
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:71 of 2016Date of Institution:02.02.2016Date of Decision:16.08.2016Guarav Kumar r/o 2287-A, Sector 20-C, Chandigarh.….ComplainantVs.1) Xiaomi inc. 68 Qinghe Middle Street, Haidia...
Case Number: 71
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2016
XIAOMI Communication Co., Ltd. V/S Yogesh Kumar Goel
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Inderjit Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 12/08/2016ORDER In view of the note appended by the complainant, on the complaint itself, with regard to his getting new mobile handset and return of old handset to the OPs as well as the withdrawal of the complaint, hence this complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn. Ce...
Case Number: 334
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
XIAOMI TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT.LTD. V/S DEEPAK KUMAR.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Complaint Case No.:160 of 2016Date of Institution:27.06.2016Date of Decision:29.06.2016Deepak Kumar S/o Sh.Mohinder Singh, R/o H.No.2770, Sector-15, Panchkula, Haryana. ….ComplainantVersus1. Xiaomi Technol...
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2016
Xiaomi India C/O Ikeva Busines Centre V/S Bablu Kumar Singh
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Balraj Singh Bahamniya
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/1601. Bablu Kumar SinghSon of Sh. Ram Naresh, R/o Sunder Nagar, Thermal Colony, Assan Khurd, Near Gate no. 3, PTPS, PanipatPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Xiaomi India C/O Ikeva Busines Cent...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-06-2016
Case Number: 541
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2019
XIAOMI INDIA (MI) ROCKET KOMMERCE LLP. V/S RAJESH MOTIRAMJI CHAINANI
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate P.D. MEGHE
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/799/20151. RAJESH MOTIRAMJI CHAINANIC/O. AMIT SCOOTERS, 162, MBK BULIDING, WARDHAMAN NAGAR, NAGPUR-440008NagpurMaharashtra.............
Case Number: 799
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2016
XIAOMI TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT.LTD. V/S NAMISH GUPTA.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No:113 of 2015Date of Institution:18.06.2015Date of Decision:02.11.2015Namish Gupta s/o Sh.Sushil Gupta, R/o # 204, Sector-12A, Panchkula, Haryana-134115. ….ComplainantVersusXiaomi Techno...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Xiaomi in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Xiaomi ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Xiaomi under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.