Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum
Appelant Advocate Mr. S.Rahmatullah
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2020
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/14/51InComplaint Case No. CC/12/3821. Adv Ravikrishnan101, NSP Nagar, Kesavadasapuram...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The MD, M/s Wipro DigitalShubhada, Worli, Mumbai......
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Alok Mukhopadhyay
Respondant Advocate Mr. Paresh Chandra Nath.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Complaint Case No. CC/53/20121. Dr. Nasim AhemedS/o Md. A. Jalil Mollah, A-1, Amin Medical Center, 20, Mitragunge Road, Joynagar, Mazilpur, South 24 Pgs............Complainant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 53
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ganganagar
Appelant Advocate PARVEEN AHLOOVALIA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2015
Hospital Medical Institute Wipro
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. TRIDEEP PAIS & MR. SHIVAM SHARMA & MR. ASHWATH SITARAMAN
Respondant Advocate MR. AJAY CHOUDHARY, MR. REEPAK KANSAL, MR. ANKIT R. KOTHARI & MR. AJAY SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 912 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 22/08/2013 in Appeal No. 411/2007 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. M/S. WIPRO GE. MEDICAL SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.NO-4 KADUUGODI INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE - 5660067KAR...
Case Number: 912
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. TRIDEEP PAIS & MR. SHIVAM SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3037 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 21/04/2014 in Appeal No. 6/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. WIPRO GE HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD.NO-4 KADUGODI INDUSTRIAL AREA, WHITEFIELDBANGALORE- 560067KARNATAKA....
Case Number: 3037
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-08-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Panaji-GoaExecution Application No. EA/1/2005InCC/4/20011. Dr. Vijaynath TalaulikarSt. Cruz, Goa BEFORE:HONABLE MR. JUSTICE N.A.Britto PRESIDENTHONABLE MR. Shri. Jagdish Prabhudesai MEMBER For the Appellant:Shri. N. G. Kamat, lr. a...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. LALIT BHARDWAJ & MR. M.K. MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate M/S. PAWAN SHARMA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4808 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1542/2010 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/3862/20131. M/S. SATPAUL SEEDS CORPORATIONThrough ist Proprietor, Shri Trmbaka Kumar Son...
Case Number: 671
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. LALIT BHARDWAJ & MR. M.K. MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate M/S. PAWAN SHARMA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4808 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1542/2010 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/3862/20131. M/S. SATPAUL SEEDS CORPORATIONThrough ist Proprietor, Shri Trmbaka Kumar Son...
Case Number: 670
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2014
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate Ravikrishnan
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/12/3821. Adv Ravikrishnan101, NSP Nagar, Kesavadasapuram...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The MD, M/s Wipro DigitalShubhada, Worli, Mumbai............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'B...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Wipro in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Wipro ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Wipro under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.