company-name-logo

Vodafone

Latest Judgments

Total 1156 Consumer Court Cases Against Vodafone.

NCDRC

VODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LTD. & ANR. V/S JAI PARKASH PANJETA

Vodafone  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

Respondant Advocate MR.AJIT KUMAR SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2365 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/12/2010 in Appeal No. 1581/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. JAI PARKASH PANJETA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. VODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LTD. & ANR..............

Case Number: 2365

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 05-05-2014

Kerala

VODAFONE ESSAR CELLULAR LTD V/S P.SANKARAN KUTTY

Vodafone  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate PARTY IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/13/653(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/01/2013 in Case No. CC/09/542 of District Trissur)1. P.SANKARAN KUTTYPORAKKATTU HOUSE,THALAVANIKKARA,THALORE.P.OTHRISSURKERALA...........Appell...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 23-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

VODAFONE INDIA LTD. ETC. 4 V/S SHRI ANIL PRAKASH KUKREJA

Vodafone  

Court Name: Sangli

Appelant Advocate ADV. A.R. JADHAV

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/13/371. SHRI ANIL PRAKASH KUKREJANIRMAL BHAVAN, HOUSE NO. 26/31, OPP. NEW ENGLISH SCHOOL, MANGALWAR PETH, MIRAJ 416410.SANGLIMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. VODAFONE INDIA LTD. ETC. 4PENISULE CORPORATE PARK, GANPATRAO KADAM MARG, LOWER PAREL, 40...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

VODAFONE LIMITED V/S RAJUBHAI. R.BHATH

Vodafone  

Court Name: Sabar kantha

Appelant Advocate D.H.SUBNANI , C.S PANDYA

Respondant Advocate R.V.SONI

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 15-08-2020

Maharashtra

vodafone india Ltd V/S Shekhar Gadekar

Vodafone  

Court Name: Central Mumbai

Appelant Advocate in person

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI DISTRICT.Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd floor, Gen. Nagesh Marg, Nr. Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Parel, Mumbai-12.Complaint Case No. CC/12/2831. Shekhar GadekarD-101, Nandanvan Soc. S.V.Road,Behind Shoppers Stop Andheri (W)Mumbai-400 050........

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Goa

Vodafone Call Centre V/S Danzil Morais

Vodafone  

Court Name: South Goa

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SOUTH GOAMARGAO-GOAComplaint Case No. CC/14/20141. Danzil MoraisB/S-4, Chandra Gupta, Nr. Rebello Hospital, Madel, Margao, Goa-403601...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vodafone Call CentreThe Metropolition, F.P.No.27,Survey No....

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

GEN. MANA. VODAFONE WEST LTD. & OTHER V/S MEHMUD A. PATEL

Vodafone  

Court Name: Bharuch

Appelant Advocate I.V. PATEL

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 04-03-2020

Gujarat

VODAFONE WEST V/S PRADHUMAN SINGH JADEJA

Vodafone  

Court Name: Ahmedabad City

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 01-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2022

Delhi

VODAFONE V/S SANDEEP

Vodafone  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. NO. 1138/13Sh. Sandeep Kumar SaxenaProprietor of M/s SSP Brand ConversationPrivate Limited at103, Harsha Complex, Ist FloorGazipu...

Case Number: 1138

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 09-06-2016

West Bengal

The Branch Manager, Vodafone Store, Midnapore Office V/S Sri Debendra Dandapat

Vodafone  

Court Name: Paschim Midnapore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPASCHIM MEDINIPUR.Complaint case No.162/2012 Date of disposal: 21/02/2014 BEFORE : THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT : Mr. Sujit Kumar Das. MEMBER : xxxxxxxxxxxxx MEMBER : Mr. Kapot Chattopadhyay. For the Complainant/Petitioner/Plaintiff : Mr....

Case Number: 162

|

Date of Filing: 25-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vodafone in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vodafone ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Vodafone under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.