Vodafone
Latest Judgments
Total 1152 Consumer Court Cases Against Vodafone.
VODAFONE SHOW ROOM, MAVOOR ROAD, KOZHIKODE. V/S FAREEDHA
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 241 Of 20111. FAREEDHAPALPARAMBIL, VALLIKKUNNU, PANTHEERANKAVU[PO], KOZHIKODE : 673019............Complainant(s)Versus1. VODAFONE SHOW ROOM, MAVOOR ROAD, KOZHIKODE.MEENAKSHI BUILDING, NEAR ASMA TOWER, KOZHIKODE.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, B...
Case Number: 241
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Incharge Vodafone V/S Dalip Kaur
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sunil kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh.Kuljit Pal Sharma,O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/159 1. Dalip Kaurson of Tara chand r/o st.no.14,SAS Nagar,Near Tarun Public school,B...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE MANAGER VODAFONE ESSAR LTD V/S MR UDAY SHRIKRISHNA TIKEKAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR S THATTE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/11/1431. MR UDAY SHRIKRISHNA TIKEKAR R/AT 303 SHASTRI HALL 3 RD FLOOR J D MARG OPP BHATIA HOSPITAL GRANT ROAD WEST MUMBAI 400007MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Vodafone V/S Sh. Nitish Mehta
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 632 of 2010 1. Sh. Nitish MehtaS/o Late Sh. Anil Mehta R/o HOuse No. 3603 Sector-37/D Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. VodafoneEssar South Lt...
Case Number: 632
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Vodafone Essar South Ltd V/S Vijay
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 432
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2022
Mohit Sareen V/S M/s Vodafone Essar South Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Vishal Gupta, Adv. for appellant
Respondant Advocate Ms. Prabhdeep Kaur, authorized representative of respondent no. 1
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 34 of 2011 1. M/s Vodafone Essar South Ltd.formerly M/s Hutchison Essar South Ltd., C-131, Industrial Area, Phase-8, Mohali, thro...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Vodafone Essar South Ltd. V/S Baljinder Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 669 of 2010 1. Baljinder SinghS/o Late Sh. Mohinder Singh R/o 345 Advocates Enclave Sector-49/A Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Vodafone Ess...
Case Number: 669
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
RAJAN SUNDERRAJ V/S VODAFONE ESSAR LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate E P KESWANI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/88(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/12/2010 in Case No. 173/2009 of District Central Mumbai)1. VODAFONE ESSAR LTDPENINSULA CORPORATE PARK GANPATRAO KADAM MARG LOWER PAREL MUMBAI ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd V/S Jose Mathew.C
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumCivil Station,KottayamKeralaComplaint Case No. CC/09/3731. Jose Mathew.CCappil(H),Arunapuram.P.O,Pala-686574Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd2nd Floor,JCI Building,Kanjikuzhy Jn,Muttambalam.P.O,Kottayam-686004Kera...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SANJAY SURYAPRAKASH NAIDU V/S VODAFONE ESSAR CELLULAR LTD THE METROPOLITAN FPNO.27 SY NO.21
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV MANISH MESHRAM
Respondant Advocate Mr Naidu
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vodafone in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vodafone ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vodafone under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.