Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/17/73( Date of Filing : 16 Feb 2017 )1. MINIMOLKOCHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. VODAFONEKOCHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V MEMBERHON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2023
Court Name: Palakkad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, KeralaComplaint Case No. CC/170/2022( Date of Filing : 12 Sep 2022 )1. JOSEPH ABRAHAMNADUTHALAKALAYIL HOUSE, KALLINGALPADAM, PANNIYANKARA POST, PALAKKAD DIST, KERALA 678...
Case Number: 170
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2022
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2023
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. No. 941/2012AKBAR AHMEDR/O N-69, SOUTH AVENUE,SAINIK FARM, NEW DELHI – 110062….ComplainantVersusVODAFONE MOBIL...
Case Number: 941
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2023
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. No. 940/2012AKBAR AHMEDR/O N-69, SOUTH AVENUE,SAINIK FARM, NEW DELHI – 110062….ComplainantVersusVODAFONE MOBIL...
Case Number: 940
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2023
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate VK Beniwal
Respondant Advocate A.S. Kalra
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/21/46( Date of Filing : 26 Feb 2021 )1. Vinod KumarPrem Nagar Distt Sirsa SirsaHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sirsa Vodafone Store Near Old Bus Stand SirsaSirsaHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Padam Singh Thakur PRESIDENT Suk...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2021
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2023
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL MALAPPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/163/2020( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2020 )1. MUHAMMED JAMSHEEDTHATHAMPARAYIL POONTHOTTATHIL VEEDU KADANAMMANA PO MANAKADA VIA 679324...........Complainant(s)Versus1. VODAFONE KERALA HEAD OFFICEANGELS ARCADE TVS RO...
Case Number: 163
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2023
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI SUBURBAN NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, OPP.DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (EAST), DISTRICT-MUMBAI SUBURBAN -400 051, MAHARASHTRA.Complaint Case No. CC/201/2019( Date of Filing : 28 May 2019 )1. MR. RISHI GAD...
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2023
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Jaswant Singh
Respondant Advocate
Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionLadowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/540/2019( Date of Filing : 08 Nov 2019 )1. Gaurav KatyalGaurav Katyal son of Ashok Kumar Katyal, Sakay Overseas, 410, Leath...
Case Number: 540
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2023
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sunil Mallan
Respondant Advocate
Before Grahak Madhyastata Samadhan held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 285 OF 2022Hema Mallan Vs Vodafone Idea Cellular & ors. BEFORE: PAWANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRE...
Case Number: 285
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2022
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2023
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Raghuvesh Singhal
Respondant Advocate
Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/493/2021( Date of Filing : 28 Sep 2021 )1. Prashant Kaul S/o D.N. KaulD-29, Jal Vidyut Apartment Sec-21C, FBD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vodafone Idea Ltd. Formerly known as Idea Cellular Ltd.A-86, Se...
Case Number: 493
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2023
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vodafone in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vodafone ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vodafone under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.