
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A.C. Trivedi & S.P. Pandey
Respondant Advocate Isar Husain
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/490/2018( Date of Filing : 15 Mar 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/02/2018 in Case No. C/130/2017 of District Sitapur)1. YashminSitapur...........
Case Number: 490
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-06-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Nath Tewari
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/34/2019( Date of Filing : 01 May 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/04/2019 in Case No. C/157/2017 of District Azamgarh)1. Mohd. AarifS/O S...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2019
Court Name: Allahabad
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Nath Pandey
Respondant Advocate Rakesh Chandra Gosain
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/178/2014Mahmud AlamVs.VidyutBEFORE:JUDGES Sukh Lal PRESIDENTSuman Pandey MEMBERFor the Complainant:For the Opp. Party:Dated : 26 Apr 2019ORDER26.04.2019 पेश हुआ। वादी पुकार पर अनुपस्थ�...
Case Number: 178
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Isar Husain
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2652/2016( Date of Filing : 24 Oct 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/09/2016 in Case No. C/21/2016 of District Bulandshahr)1. Panchimanchal Vidy...
Case Number: 2652
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JABAR SINGH & MR. PRAMOD KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2862 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 21/12/2016 in Appeal No. 1542/2016 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SATISH KUMARS/O. SHRI KAPOOR SINGH, R/O. MOHALLA BANJAARAN NEAR BYPASS BLOCK NAKUR, DIST...
Case Number: 2862
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M P Solanki
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. RBT/A/18/125InFirst Appeal No. A/18/1251. President Mah Rajya Vidyut Mandal Chaturtha Shreni Vidyut Karmachari Sahakari Patha Sanstha Maryadit Akola nnd twoPresident Mah Raya Vidyut...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2019
Court Name: Allahabad
Appelant Advocate Santosh Kumar Pandey
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/187/2014Ratan DeviVs.VidyutBEFORE:JUDGES Sukh Lal PRESIDENTSuman Pandey MEMBERFor the Complainant:For the Opp. Party:Dated : 08 Apr 2019ORDER08.04.2019 पेश हुआ। वादी अनुपस्थित। विगत त�...
Case Number: 187
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH. DEEPESH JOSHI
Respondant Advocate SH. AJAY DUBEY
M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPALPLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 2816 OF 2008(Arising out of order dated 30.09.2008 passed in C.C.No.559/2007 by District Forum, Satna)RAMRAJ MISHRA … APPELLANTVersusJUNIOR ENGINEER, GRAMIN VIDYUT S...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH HEMANT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate SH. R. BHARGAVA
O R D E R S H E E T ( C O N T D. )Vinod Kumar Bahel Vs. MPMKVVCo.Ltd.Case NO. FA/08/1162DATE OF ORDERORDER WITH SIGNATUREORDER OF THE REGISTRAR ON OFFICE NOTING30.03.2019 Shri Hemant Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Swarnim Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2019
Court Name: Bhandara
Appelant Advocate Adv.T.S.Shingade
Respondant Advocate MR. D.R.NIRWN
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BHANDARANear Akhil Sabhagruha, Ganeshpur Road,BhandaraComplaint Case No. CC/18/18( Date of Filing : 13 Apr 2018 )1. Mamta Nandkishor BagdeR/o Plot.No.24. Gopiwada. Post.Shahpur Tah.Bhandara.BHANDARAMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.