company-name-logo

Vidyut

Latest Judgments

Total 4027 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Chandra Kishor

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate B.L. Chaudhary Adv.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Adv.

Case Number: 183

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-1995

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Shiv Balak Gupta

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shri Surya Kumar Gupta Advocate

Respondant Advocate Shri Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/391/1995( Date of Filing : 02 Jun 1995 )1. Shiv Balak Gupta Vill Dhani Kheda, Tahsil Purwa, Unnao ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad Unnao ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. S.C....

Case Number: 391

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-1995

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parshad V/S Vishweshwar Singh

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shir Ram Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Case Number: 546

|

Date of Filing: 24-08-1995

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Ramesh Chandra Singh

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Yashwant Singh Advocate

Respondant Advocate Shri Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Case Number: 603

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-1995

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer , Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Awadh Naresh Agnihotri

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Rashmi Mohan Agnihotri Advocate

Respondant Advocate Shri Mahendra Shankar Awasthi Advocate

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-1995

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Rama Shankar Shukla

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shri Jai Shankar Shrivastava Advocate

Respondant Advocate Shri Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Case Number: 737

|

Date of Filing: 07-12-1995

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Javed Akhtar

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shri J.K. Nigam Advocate

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/617/1995( Date of Filing : 20 Sep 1995 )1. Javed Akhtar Vill Mohan , Tahsil Hasanganj, Unnao ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vidyut Vitran Khand Unnao ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. S.C. Tiwari PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAM KUMAR SH...

Case Number: 617

|

Date of Filing: 20-09-1995

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad, Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Smt. Kanij Begam

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shri Girish Kumar Mishra Advocate

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Case Number: 256

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-1994

|

Date of Upload: 02-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Parmeshwar Varma

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shri Ram Charan Singh Lodhi Advocate

Respondant Advocate Shri Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/126/1995( Date of Filing : 09 Feb 1995 )1. Parmeshwar Varma Vill Sohrua Talab , Tahsil Safipur, Unano ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad Unnao ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. ...

Case Number: 126

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-1995

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Smt. Nirmla Devi

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shri S.M. Singh Advocate

Respondant Advocate Shri Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate

Case Number: 516

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-1995

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.