Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHYAM MOORJANI
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 29 Jun 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2238/2009(Against the Order dated 26/03/2009 in Appeal No. 410/2005 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Thrugh Ex. Engineer O&M. Sikar ...
Case Number: 2238
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 25-11-2009
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 10 Sep 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3443/2009(Against the Order dated 20/01/2009 in Appeal No. 1381/2004 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. UTTAR HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD.Sub Divisional office ...
Case Number: 3443
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2009
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 02 Sep 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2331/2005(Against the Order dated 06/03/2005 in Appeal No. 823/2005 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. AJAMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.O & M JHUNJHUNU RAJASTHAN - .....
Case Number: 2331
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2005
|
Date of Upload: 08-10-2009
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL & A.K. VATSYA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 15 Apr 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1290/2009(Against the Order dated 01/12/2008 in Appeal No. 848/2003 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.Throug Its Managing Dire...
Case Number: 1290
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 08-10-2009
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M N Mishra
Respondant Advocate Dhrove Kumar
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/138(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Dakshinanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltda...........Appellant(s)Versus...
Case Number: 2008
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Gadchiroli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate adv. Sanjay V. Deshmukh
Complaint Case No. CC/08/241. Smt. Pramila shankar Parise, Age 47 years, Occu.-ServiceD.P.H.C. Employer no.1, Prathmik Swasthya kendra,Permili, ta. AheriGadchiroliMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1) Sub. Engee. maharashtra state electricity vidyut distribution Ltd., su...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Tandon
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/386(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Nafis Ahmad Etah BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Chandra Bhal Srivastava PRESIDING MEMBERHON'AB...
Case Number: 2003
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Wardha
Appelant Advocate Adv.M.G.Sukhija
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer ForumSewagram Road, Opposite Yashwant Collegeconsumer case(CC) No. CC/08/48 Manohar Chandulal Balwani ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Executive Engineer, Maharashtra Rajya vidyut vitran company limited ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Sau.Sushama W/O Pradeep Joshi...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR.SAKESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 27 May 2008 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI.Revision Petition(RP) No. RP/08/2319(Against the Order dated 05/03/2008 in Appeal No. 445/2007 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) 1. M.P MADHYA KSHETRA KESHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD Through...
Case Number: 2319
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate R K AGRAWAL ADV
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.