Vidyut
Latest Judgments
Total 4047 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.
GUJARAT VIDYUT BOARD V/S SIMABHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL
Court Name: Patan
Appelant Advocate J.S.RAWAT
Respondant Advocate S.S.SHAH
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2020
HARYANA VIDYUT PARASAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S SWARANJIT SINGH ANAND
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MAHALING PANDARGE
Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Date of Filing: 07 Aug 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2915/2009(Against the Order dated 08/04/2009 in Appeal No. 1355/2002 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SWARANJIT SINGH ANANDS/o Shri Chet Singh Anand, Sole Prop. of ...
Case Number: 2915
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2010
TEJ RAM V/S JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 18 Jan 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/405/2010(Against the Order dated 18/11/2009 in Appeal No. 247/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Sh. Raj Singh Yadav, Ex...
Case Number: 405
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2010
Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand 2nd V/S Ram Naresh
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Shri Praveen Dubey Ad.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2022
Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand 2nd V/S Ram Babu Verma
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Salman Ahmad Ad.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-06-2022
Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Deshraj
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2022
UTTARI HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD., JHAJJAR (HR) & ANR. V/S JAGDEV SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPUL RAHEJA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 07 Oct 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3736/2009(Against the Order dated 16/07/2009 in Appeal No. 2790/2003 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. JAGDEV SINGHS/o. Sh. Puran Singh R/o. Baghpur Tehsil Beri Jhaj...
Case Number: 3736
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2010
MALIRAM V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITERAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHYAM MOORJANI
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 02 Dec 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4435/2009(Against the Order dated 18/08/2006 in Appeal No. 600/1998 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. AJMER VIDYUT VITERAN NIGAM LTD.Through Executive Engineer, AV...
Case Number: 4435
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2010
BHAIRA RAM V/S JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3386 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 10/07/2009 in Appeal No. 13/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through the Executive EngineerJodhpurRajasthan ...........Peti...
Case Number: 3386
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2010
CHAMPA LAL V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL & A.K. VATSYA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 17 Nov 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4244/2009(Against the Order dated 08/07/2009 in Appeal No. 923/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Niga...
Case Number: 4244
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2009
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.