company-name-logo

Vidyut

Latest Judgments

Total 4047 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.

Maharashtra

Ma.Adhixhyak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company ltd.Beed V/S Shobhabai Ashok Jadhav

Vidyut  

Court Name: Beed

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/10/801. Shobhabai Ashok Jadhav...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ma.Adhixhyak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company ltd.Beed............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: P. B. Bhat PRESIDENT Sou. M. S. Vishwarupe MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERतक्रारदा...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 29-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Uttar Pradesh

M.D Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Shiv Rani

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Surendra Singh Yadav Ad.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.

Case Number: 176

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2007

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2022

NCDRC

SMT. ACHUKI V/S JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2397 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 07/04/2010 in Appeal No. 144/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Executive Engineer (O & M), MathaniaJodhpurRajasthan ...........

Case Number: 2397

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 04-08-2010

Uttar Pradesh

Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Rudra Pratap Singh

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Ravindra Pratap Singh Ad.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.

Case Number: 296

|

Date of Filing: 25-08-2003

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Vinod Kumar

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate S.P Bajpai Ad.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.

Case Number: 186

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2008

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2022

NCDRC

PASHCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. V/S SAMAY SINGH

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ASHUTOSH SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. D.K. BHAYANI & MR. PRADEEP MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1156 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 29/03/2006 in Appeal No. 83/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SAMAY SINGHVILLAGE NANGLI NAGHLA NOIDA JANPAT GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR UP ...........Petitioner(s...

Case Number: 1156

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2006

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2010

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand 1st V/S Om Prakash

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Tripathi Ad.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Triapthi ad.

Case Number: 159

|

Date of Filing: 05-08-2008

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer , Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Santosh Kumar

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Ambrish Kumar Gupta Ad.

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 60

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2006

|

Date of Upload: 16-06-2022

NCDRC

DAKSHINI HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S NARAIN PRASAD SHARMA

Vidyut   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSSHU UPADHYAY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1956 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 29/01/2010 in Appeal No. 1128/2003 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. NARAIN PRASAD SHARMAResident of Village Amarpura, Tehsil NarnaulMahendergarhHaryana .............

Case Number: 1956

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 08-07-2010

Uttar Pradesh

Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Ramchandra

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Vans Bahadur Ad.

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 231

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2009

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.