company-name-logo

Vidyut

Latest Judgments

Total 4019 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.

Maharashtra

Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta, Shahari Up-Vibhag,Beed,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company ltd.(Mahavi V/S Vinayak Manikrao Gayake

Vidyut  

Court Name: Beed

Appelant Advocate R.S.Kukkadgaonkar.

Respondant Advocate A.S.Patil.

Complaint Case No. CC/10/951. Vinayak Manikrao GayakeShahunagar,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta, Shahari Up-Vibhag,Beed,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company ltd.(Mahavitaran)Karyalay,Malives,Beed.Shahri Up-Vibhag,Bee...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta, Shahari Up-Vibhag,Beed,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. (Mahavi V/S Vinayak Manikrao Gayke.3

Vidyut  

Court Name: Beed

Appelant Advocate R.S.Kukkadgonkar.

Respondant Advocate A.S.Patil.

Complaint Case No. CC/10/961. Vinayak Manikrao Gayke.3R/o Shahunagar,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta, Shahari Up-Vibhag,Beed,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. (Mahavitaran)Karyalay,Malives,Beed,Tq.& Dist.Beed...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Dinesh Pratap Singh

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Mirja Jahid Ali Ad.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Triapathi Ad.

Case Number: 251

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2007

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2022

NCDRC

M/S. PRAGYA PRODUCTS V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3364 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 03/05/2010 in Appeal No. 340/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.Through its CMD.Chairman, Hathi Bhatta City Power HouseA...

Case Number: 3364

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2010

NCDRC

UDAI RAM V/S JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN

Respondant Advocate MR. ASIT KUMAR ROY & SANDEEP SHARMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 773 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 04/08/2008 in Appeal No. 2208/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through The Executive Engineer O& M Rattangarh, Rajasthan.......

Case Number: 773

|

Date of Filing: 13-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2010

NCDRC

DHANNA RAM V/S JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2196 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/02/2010 in Appeal No. 286/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Executive Engineer (O & M), Raisnghnagar, RatangarhChuruRajas...

Case Number: 2196

|

Date of Filing: 08-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 08-12-2010

NCDRC

BHAROSI RAM MEENA V/S JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. K. VIJANANI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 494 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 26/10/2009 in Appeal No. 734/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Sh. Raj Singh Yadav, Executive Engineer (CD), J.V.V.N.L...

Case Number: 494

|

Date of Filing: 27-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2011

Uttar Pradesh

Executive Engineer, Rajya Vidyut Parishad V/S Smt. Kalawati Kuril

Vidyut  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar Shrivastava Ad.

Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.

Case Number: 225

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 25-06-2022

NCDRC

DAKSHINANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S GAUPAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH CHADHA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3279 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 09/08/2010 in Appeal No. 1622/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GAUPAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.NW-83, Swamibagh DayalbaghAgraUttar Pradesh...........Petitione...

Case Number: 3279

|

Date of Filing: 17-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 03-12-2010

Maharashtra

Chif Engineer Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Beed & Other-02 V/S Smt. Kawita urf Trishala Pandurang Markande

Vidyut  

Court Name: Beed

Appelant Advocate P.R. Choure

Respondant Advocate U.D.Chapalgaonkar

Complaint Case No. CC/10/161. Smt. Kawita urf Trishala Pandurang MarkandeR/o.Juna Nagar Naka,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Chif Engineer Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Beed & Other-02Jalna Road,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtr...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.