Vidyut
Latest Judgments
Total 4016 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.
EE, Vidyut Vitran Khand 1 V/S Ram Sumer
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate J.P Saroj Ad.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2022
DAKSHIN HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. V/S ISHWAR SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MOHIT MUDGIL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/04/2010 in Appeal No. 1120/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ISHWAR SINGHR/o. Village Muzafara, Tehsil PataudiGurgaonHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 2933
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2011
DHARMA V/S JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHYAM MOORJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4681 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 15/09/2009 in Appeal No. 2186/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.Through Ex-Engineer (O&M), ShahpuraJaipurRajsthan2. AS...
Case Number: 4681
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2011
SH. CHATURBHUJ V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHYAM MOORJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3923 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 13/07/2009 in Appeal No. 2311/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Ex-Engineer O & M Nawalgarh Rajasthan ...........Petit...
Case Number: 3923
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2011
EE, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Smt. Amita Pandey
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Shri Kant Tiwari Ad.
Respondant Advocate S.N Madhukar Ad.
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2022
EE, Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Ramesh Chandra
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Gulab Singh Ad.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2022
NAND KISHOR V/S JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATAES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 672 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/10/2009 in Appeal No. 1072/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Sh. D.K. Gupta, Executive Engineer (O&M)BoondiRajastha...
Case Number: 672
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2011
Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta, Shahari Up-Vibhag,Beed,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company ltd.(Mahavi V/S Vinayak Manikrao Gayake
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate R.S.Kukkadgaonkar.
Respondant Advocate A.S.Patil.
Complaint Case No. CC/10/951. Vinayak Manikrao GayakeShahunagar,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta, Shahari Up-Vibhag,Beed,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company ltd.(Mahavitaran)Karyalay,Malives,Beed.Shahri Up-Vibhag,Bee...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta, Shahari Up-Vibhag,Beed,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. (Mahavi V/S Vinayak Manikrao Gayke.3
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate R.S.Kukkadgonkar.
Respondant Advocate A.S.Patil.
Complaint Case No. CC/10/961. Vinayak Manikrao Gayke.3R/o Shahunagar,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta, Shahari Up-Vibhag,Beed,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. (Mahavitaran)Karyalay,Malives,Beed,Tq.& Dist.Beed...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand V/S Dinesh Pratap Singh
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Mirja Jahid Ali Ad.
Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Triapathi Ad.
Case Number: 251
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2007
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.