Vidyut
Latest Judgments
Total 4016 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.
Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. V/S Rajesh Soni
Vidyut Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company
Court Name: Chhatarpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2016
Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company ltd. V/S Pandharinath Rambhau Jogdand.
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate S.B.Wadmare.
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/421. Pandharinath Rambhau Jogdand.R/o Govindnagar, Dhanora road,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Up-Karyakari Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company ltd. Jalna road,Beed,Tq.& Dist.BeedBeedMaharastra..............
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Assistant Engineer,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Dharur. V/S Ghanshyam Shriram Toshniwal.
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate K.R.Tekwani
Respondant Advocate S.N.Tandale
Complaint Case No. 116/20051. Ghanshyam Shriram Toshniwal.R/o.Main Road,Kille Dharur,Dist.Beed...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Assistant Engineer,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Dharur.Sub-Division,Dharur,Dist.Beed............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: P. B. Bhat PRESIDEN...
Case Number: 116
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MANJU LAL V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 609 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 17/11/2006 in Appeal No. 1756/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ASSISTANT ENGINER O.SM AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD ...
Case Number: 609
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2011
Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. V/S Avadhesh Khare
Vidyut Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company
Court Name: Chhatarpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S KISHANLAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3000 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 28/08/2009 in Appeal No. 1237/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. KISHANLALResident of Maanpura, Tehsil PratapgarhPratapgarhRajasthan...........Petitioner(s)V...
Case Number: 3000
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2011
SITA RAM V/S JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate MR. KUNAL CHAWRIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3219 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 10/06/2010 in Appeal No. 1539/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Executive Engineer (DD-II), DiscomJaipurRajasthan...........P...
Case Number: 3219
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2011
Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. V/S Dinesh Chandra Tiwari
Vidyut Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company
Court Name: Chhatarpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
J.E Vidyut Upkendra V/S Manager, Maulana Hasrat Mohani Balika Ucchtar Madhyamik Vidyalay
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Kumar Tiwari Ad.
Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2022
Mohan Balkrishna Mangalekar,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Co.Ltd., V/S Prakash Mahadev Mane
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate P.B.Jadhav
Respondant Advocate
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurExecution Application No. EA/10/399 1. Prakash Mahadev ManeKasaba beed, Tal.Karvir, Dist.Kolhapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Mohan Balkrishna Mangalekar,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Co.Ltd., Koge, Tal.Karvir, Dist.Kolhapur ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.