Vidyut
Latest Judgments
Total 4072 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.
Kanistha Abhiyanta/Sahayyak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. Dharur,Dist.Beed V/S Ramrao Shridharrao Shingare
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate A.D.Kale
Respondant Advocate S.N.Tandale
Complaint Case No. 95/20061. Ramrao Shridharrao ShingareMu.Post.Dharur (Kasba Vibhag),Shivaji nagar,Dharur,Dist.Beed...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kanistha Abhiyanta/Sahayyak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. Dharur,Dist.BeedDharur,Dist.Beed............Op...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Up-Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. Majalgaon& Other-01 V/S Vijay Raghunath Pawar.
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate S.P.Laghane
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1641. Vijay Raghunath Pawar.R/o.Lukhegaon,Tq.Majalgaon,Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Up-Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. Majalgaon& Other-01M.S.E.B.Karyalay Majalgaon,Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra.2. Karyakar...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Sahayyak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Patoda. V/S Sopan Sarjerao Sabale
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate E.G.Kakade
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1651. Sopan Sarjerao SabaleR/o.Sabalewadi, (Amalner-Bhandyache),Tq.Patoda,Dist.BeedBeedMaharashtra............Complainant(s)Versus1. Sahayyak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Patoda. Up-Vibhagiya Karyalay,Patoda,Dist.BeedBeedMaharash...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
RATTAN LAL SHARMA V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1055 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/01/2011 in Appeal No. 1390/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.NawalgarhJhunjhunuRajasthan...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RA...
Case Number: 1055
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2011
Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand 2 V/S Raj Dev
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Shri Avinash Shankar Nigam Ad.
Respondant Advocate S.N Madhukar Ad.
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2022
Mohd. Rafique V/S M.P.Western Region Vidyut Vitran
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2017
GUJARAT GRAM KAMDAR KALYAN VIDYUT BOARD+2 V/S CHAUHAN DIVABEN GOPALBHAI
Court Name: Mahesana
Appelant Advocate P.A.GANDHI
Respondant Advocate P.A.JOSHI
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2021
DAUD ISMAIL ALWANI V/S PASCHIM GUJARAT VIDYUT COMPANY LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate MR. PRIANK ADHYARU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1424 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/04/2006 in Appeal No. 323/2006 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. PASCHIM GUJARAT VIDYUT COMPANY LIMITED...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAUD ISMAIL ALWANI.........
Case Number: 1424
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2011
Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand 1 V/S Smt. Mohsina Begam
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Pankaj Tripathi Ad.
Respondant Advocate Nihal Ahmad Ad.
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-07-2022
Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. V/S Jagannath Raikwar
Vidyut Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company
Court Name: Chhatarpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.