Vidyut
Latest Judgments
Total 4072 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.
M.P. VIDYUT MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LTD. V/S KISHAN LAL
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2022
DAKSHIN HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S KANHIYA LAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.C. THAKUR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3114 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 31/05/2012 in Appeal No. 629/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KANHIYA LALS/o Sh Bodan lal R/o nai basti, Rewari,tehsilRewariHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Ve...
Case Number: 3114
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2014
M P VIDYUT VITRAL CO LTD V/S SHRI VIJAI SHARMA
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate ADV
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2022
ANITA DEVI V/S DHBVNL THOROUGH ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER VIDYUT NAGAR HISAR & ANR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2717 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 28/03/2008 in Appeal No. 611/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DHBVNL THOROUGH ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER VIDYUT NAGAR HISAR & ANRVidyut NagarHisarHaryana2. ...
Case Number: 2717
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2013
Sahayyak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.(Mahavitaran) V/S Gajanan Bhivaji Waghmare.
Court Name: Parbhani
Appelant Advocate Jitendra N.Ghuge.
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2121. Gajanan Bhivaji Waghmare.R/o.Dharmapuri,Tq.& Dist.Parbhani ParbhaniMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sahayyak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.(Mahavitaran) (Mahavitaran) Vidyut Bhavan,Jinturrora,Parbhani ParbhaniMah...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1) Adhikshak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd.Parbhani & Other-01 V/S Golecha Jinning Pressing Factory,Vasmat road,Parbhani Marfat:- Karyakari Bhagidar, Anita Pradeep Golecha.
Court Name: Parbhani
Appelant Advocate Shirish N.Welankar
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2301. Golecha Jinning Pressing Factory,Vasmat road,Parbhani Marfat:- Karyakari Bhagidar, Anita Pradeep Golecha. Karegaon,Tq.& Dist.ParbhaniParbhaniMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1) Adhikshak Abhiyanta,Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitaran Company...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Ltd. V/S Chooraman Ahirwar
Vidyut Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company
Court Name: Chhatarpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2016
PHOOLCHAND BHUJWA V/S GRAMIN VIDYUT SAHAKARI SAMITI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH S.N. RAO
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2016
KAMLA DEVI V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 267 OF 2013 IN RP/3900/20121. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KAMLA DEVI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE, PRESIDI...
Case Number: 267
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2013
RAMLAKHAN DAS V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. ETC
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHYAM MOORJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2591 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 03/01/2008 in Appeal No. 155/2002 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. ETCNeemkathanaSikarRajasthan2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AJMER VIDYU...
Case Number: 2591
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.