Vidyut
Latest Judgments
Total 4072 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.
OM PRAKASH V/S ASSISTANT ENGINEER. (CSD-IV) AJMER VIDYUT BITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL & MR. SHALAJ MRIDUL
Respondant Advocate MR. UMESH NAGPAL, MR. PANKAJ SHARMA & MR. LOKESH BHARGAWA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 619 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/10/2013 in Appeal No. 536/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/150/20141. ASSISTANT ENGINEER. (CSD-IV) AJMER VIDYUT BITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS.AJMER VI...
Case Number: 619
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2014
MANATISPAT PVT. LTD. & ANR. V/S PASCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.R. & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. SARVESH KUMAR SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 43 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 27/12/2013 in Complaint No. 184/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/279/2014,IA/987/20141. PASCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS MAN...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2014
VIDYUT VITRAN KENDRA AND ONE ANOTHER V/S SHYAM KISHOR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH P.N. SHUKLA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2016
Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitran Co. Tarfe Karyakari Abhiyanta & Others 2 V/S Shri. Shivajirao Maruti Bisle
Court Name: Sangli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/1181. Shri. Shivajirao Maruti BisleSambhajinagar, Jat SangliMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Vitran Co. Tarfe Karyakari Abhiyanta & Others 2 KavathemahankalSangliMaharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: A.V. Deshpan...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MADHAYA PRADESH MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. & ANR. V/S KAMAL KISHORE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2174 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 04/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1170/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) WITH IA/3614/2013,IA/3814/20131. KAMAL KISHORES/O SH.NAND KISHORE KURNI, R/O GRAM JHUJHA...
Case Number: 2174
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2014
M/S. SURYA TRADING COMPANY V/S DHBVNL VIDYUT NAGAR & 2 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 676 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 14/11/2013 in Appeal No. 835/2013 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/325/20141. DHBVNL VIDYUT NAGAR & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,HISARHARYANA2. THE E...
Case Number: 676
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2014
Adhiksha Yantri, Vidyut Vitran Col Ltd. Gwalior V/S lado Bai
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2016
MADHYA PRADESH POORV VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LTD. V/S RAMESH KUMAR KASAR , PRO. RAMESH PRAKASAN BALAGHAT
Court Name: Balaghat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2017
SH. KANA V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL, A.K. VATSYA & MS. PRIYANKA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1151 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1301/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.thrugh its Assitant Engineer,Ltd., DunglaChittorgarhRaj...
Case Number: 1151
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2014
M P MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO LTD V/S SMT SAVITRI DEVHA
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate SACHIN PANDYA ADV
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.