company-name-logo

Vidyut

Latest Judgments

Total 4072 Consumer Court Cases Against Vidyut.

Uttar Pradesh

EXEN Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.- II V/S Jagdish Upadhyay

Vidyut  

Court Name: Ghazipur

Appelant Advocate Shri Shivaji Shrivastava

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 53

|

Date of Filing: 10-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 20-04-2017

NCDRC

BHAGGA V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 86 OF 2014 IN RP/329/20121. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. BHAGGA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR...

Case Number: 86

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2014

NCDRC

MADAN LAL V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 87 OF 2014 IN RP/330/20121. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. MADAN LAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE...

Case Number: 87

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2014

NCDRC

NARAYAN LAL V/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MANU MRIDUL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2014 IN RP/331/20121. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. NARAYAN LAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'B...

Case Number: 88

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2014

NCDRC

M/S. KAPOOR ICE FACTORY V/S HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1109 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/08/2006 in Appeal No. 1053/2000 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD. NOW UHBVNL, THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER O. P. SUB...

Case Number: 1109

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 05-05-2014

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Executive Engineer Urban Sub Division MSEDCL Vidyut Bhavan Arni road Yavatmal V/S Shubhanchadra Dhansukh Bhoot

Vidyut   Msedcl  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate .

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001Revision Petition No. RP/13/5(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/08/2012 in Case No. cc/10/146 of District Yavatmal)1. Shubhanchadra Dhans...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 11-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Uttar Pradesh

EXEN Purvanch Vidyut Vitran Nigam V/S Surendra Prasad

Vidyut  

Court Name: Ghazipur

Appelant Advocate Shri Raj Kumar Jaiswal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 195

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 20-04-2017

NCDRC

MISHRI LAL V/S MANAGING DIRECTOR, POORVANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS.

Vidyut  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. LAV KUMAR AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1045 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 21/01/2010 in Appeal No. 1628/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, POORVANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS.DLW BHIKARIPUR,VARANASI...

Case Number: 1045

|

Date of Filing: 06-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2014

Uttar Pradesh

Case Number: 63

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2017

West Bengal

Case Number: 188

|

Date of Filing: 07-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-04-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.