Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. L. NANDWANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4693 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 10/09/2010 in Appeal No. 1383/2005 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Sh. Parveen Kumar Khatri, Executive Engineer (D.D.II...
Case Number: 4693
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4693 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 10/09/2010 in Appeal No. 1383/2005 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Sh. Parveen Kumar Khatri, Executive Engineer (D.D.II...
Case Number: 4716
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2014
Court Name: Varanasi
Appelant Advocate A. K. Pandey
Respondant Advocate R. Prasad
Case Number: 286
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-03-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2066 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 22/02/2010 in Appeal No. 1481/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Assistant Engineer VitranHanumangarhRajasthan...........Peti...
Case Number: 2066
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. SHOBHA
Respondant Advocate M/S. MONIKA ARORA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 94 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 10/05/2005 in Appeal No. 634/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.JYOTI NAGAR JAIPURJAIPUR ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ANAND ...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2006
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOICATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1856 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 10/01/2014 in Appeal No. 1406/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTDTHROUGH A.S KAMLANKER, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (O&M) J.V.V.N.L. BA...
Case Number: 1856
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. SABYASACHI MISHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2510 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 13/04/2011 in Appeal No. 821/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.Jyoti Nagar, through Managing DirectorJaipurRajasthan.....
Case Number: 2510
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate MR. UMESH NAGPAL, MR. PANKAJ SHARMA & MR. LOKESH BHARGAV
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 112 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1685/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITEDVidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar,JaipurRajasthan.........
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR.PAWAN KUMAR RAY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3163 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 08/06/2010 in Appeal No. 2064/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through C.M. Gupta, Executive Engineer (O & M), J.V.V.N.L.Bha...
Case Number: 3163
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NANDWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. SABCOUNCILORS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4875 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/09/2013 in Appeal No. 817/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.THROUGH SH.V.D BANSAL, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,(O & m) J.V.V.N.L. L...
Case Number: 4875
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vidyut in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vidyut ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vidyut under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.