Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/93/1993( Date of Filing : 07 May 1993 )1. Shatrughan Singh 312 Moti Nagar, Unnao...........Complainant(s)Versus1. EE. Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad Unnao............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. S.K PANDEY PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAM SHA...
Case Number: 93
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-1993
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Shri Pramod Kumar Shrivastava Advocate
Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/94/1993( Date of Filing : 07 Aug 1993 )1. Smt. Shashi Shrivastava 312 Moti Nagar, Unnao ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Virendra Singh, Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Parishad Unnao ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-1993
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate N.K Agrawal Ad.
Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.
Case Number: 240
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-1993
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Shri Girish Kumar Mishra Ad.
Respondant Advocate Shri Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-1994
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 239
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-1993
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Dashrath Lal Ad.
Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.
Case Number: 215
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-1993
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Shri Ram Lakhan Sharma Ad.
Respondant Advocate Mahendra Shankar Tripathi Ad.
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-1992
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate Shri Lal Bahadur Advocate
Respondant Advocate Shri Atma Ram Pandey Advocate
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-1993
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 164
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-1992
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2022
Court Name: Unnao
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-1992
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uttar Pradesh in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uttar Pradesh ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uttar Pradesh under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.