company-name-logo

Uttar Pradesh

Latest Judgments

Total 840 Consumer Court Cases Against Uttar Pradesh.

NCDRC

UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD & ANR. V/S OMPAL SINGH

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 264 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/01/2008 in Appeal No. 2491/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. OMPAL SINGHR/o. 262, Natesh Puram Kankar KheraMeerutUttar Pradesh...........Petitioner(s)...

Case Number: 264

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 07-01-2013

Uttar Pradesh

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited V/S Baljit Singh

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Ram Pratap Yadav Ad.

Respondant Advocate Nihal Ahmad Ad.

Case Number: 68

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 19-08-2022

NCDRC

FOOLMATI DEVI V/S UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate DR. INDRA PRATAP SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1301 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/01/2009 in Appeal No. 2882/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHADThrough Housing Commissioner, 104 Mahatama Gandhi ...

Case Number: 1301

|

Date of Filing: 29-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2012

Uttar Pradesh

M.D Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited V/S Jai Jai Gramodyog Seva Samiti

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate S.P Bajpai Ad.

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 10-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

M.D Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited V/S Subhas Singh

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Prasant Tripathi Ad.

Respondant Advocate Nihal Ahmad Ad.

Case Number: 51

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2022

NCDRC

RAMAKANT SHARMA V/S UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVEN VIKAS PARISHAD & ANR .

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. SANJAY MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 605 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 23/05/2007 in Appeal No. 2890/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVEN VIKAS PARISHAD & ANR .THROUGH ITS HOUSING COMMISSIONER, 104, M. G...

Case Number: 605

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 28-08-2012

NCDRC

LAXMI DEVI V/S UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVEN VIKAS PARISHAD & ANR.

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. SANJAY MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 606 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 23/05/2007 in Appeal No. 2891/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVEN VIKAS PARISHAD & ANR. THROUGH ITS HOUSING COMMISSIONER, 104, M. G...

Case Number: 606

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 28-08-2012

Uttar Pradesh

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited V/S Jitendra Kumar Tripathi

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Ashok Kumar Shukla Ad

Respondant Advocate S.N Madhukar Ad.

Case Number: 187

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 19-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

M.D Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited V/S Ram Naresh Singh

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate V.S Chauhan Ad.

Respondant Advocate Nihal Ahmad Ad.

Case Number: 153

|

Date of Filing: 18-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Uttar Pradesh Corporation Fedration Limited V/S Chandra Kishor

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Akash Dixit Ad.

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uttar Pradesh in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uttar Pradesh ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Uttar Pradesh under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.