Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AKHIL KULSHRESTHA,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 356 OF 20141. UTTAR PRADESH ENT NIRMATA KOYALA UPBHOKTTA SAMITI (REGD),Through its President, Shri R. P. Chandel, 84/226, A(B) Chandel Tiraha Afeem Kothi,KANPUR............Complainant(s)Versus1. THE CHAIRM...
Case Number: 356
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. INDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3358 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/07/2013 in Appeal No. 915/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UTTAR PRADESH AVAS VIKAS PARISHAD & ANR.PARISHAD THROUGH AVAS AYUKT, 104, MAHATMA GANDHI ...
Case Number: 3358
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-04-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K.P. SUNDAR RAO & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 539 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/11/2012 in Appeal No. 66/2008 & 1630/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/960/2013,IA/961/20131. JAGANNATH MUTREJAS/O SHRI SUNDER SINGH RAGHAV, R/...
Case Number: 539
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SARAN SURI & GUNJAN KUMAR, Advocate
Respondant Advocate MR. PRADEEP MISRA (R-1,2,3,5)
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 946 OF 2012 IN CC/64/20121. RADHASOAMI SATSANG SABHA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. UTTAR PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LTD. & 4 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. ...
Case Number: 946
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. INDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2403 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/08/2011 in Appeal No. 30/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/3994/2013,IA/3995/2013,IA/3996/20131. UTTAR PRADESH AWAS VIKAS PARISHAD & ANR.THROU...
Case Number: 2403
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-11-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 266 OF 20131. Shri DEVENDRA KUMAR GOEL,S/o late Shri Daya Prakash Goel, 4051, Joy Apartments, Plot No. 2, Sector-2, Dwarka,NEW DELHI - 110075............Complainant(s)Versus1. COMMISSIONER (HOUSING), UTTAR...
Case Number: 266
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. INDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1108 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 19/12/2012 in Appeal No. 194/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/1992/20131. SAHAYAK AVAS AYUKT, UTTAR PRADESH AVAS VIKAS PARISHADU.P AVAS VIKAS PA...
Case Number: 1108
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K.P. SUNDER RAO ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4883 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/11/2012 in Appeal No. 66/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. JAGANNATH MUTREJARep by GPA Holder, S/o Ram Chandra Mutreja, R/o House no A-91 Gali No-36 ...
Case Number: 4883
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VISHWAJIT SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR NARINDER KUMAR VERMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1042 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/11/2011 in Appeal No. 78/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD & 2 ORS.Through Avas Ayukta, 104,Mahatama Gandhi Ma...
Case Number: 1042
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BRAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3850 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/02/2012 in Appeal No. 2489/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PRABANDH NIDESHAK, UTTAR PRADESH SAHKARI GNNA SAMITI SANGH LTD. & 3 ORS.Uttar Pradesh Sa...
Case Number: 3850
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uttar Pradesh in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uttar Pradesh ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uttar Pradesh under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.