Uttar Pradesh
Latest Judgments
Total 840 Consumer Court Cases Against Uttar Pradesh.
Uttar Pradesh State Government (Commandant Homeguards) V/S Smt. Mukhtari Begum
Court Name: Muradabad-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 55
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2015
UTTAR PRADESH COWER CORPORATION V/S DEVENDRA PAL
Court Name: Bareilly-I
Appelant Advocate N.B. GANWAR
Respondant Advocate K.B. GAUTAM
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-1 BAREILLY (UTTAR PRADESH)Complaint Case No. CC/88/20141. DEVENDRA PAL NAGRIA SADAS, MEERGANJ, BAREILLY , U.P BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Muhammad Adil PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. Seema Sharma MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERपरिवादी द...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2015
Baroda Purvi Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank V/S Hari Om
Court Name: Kanpur Dehat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Dispute Redressal ForumMati, Kanpur DehatComplaint Case No. CC/31/20121. Hari OmAkbarpur, Kanpur Dehat BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Onkar Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Sumita Katiyar MEMBERHON'BLE MR. Sri Narayan Trivedi MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2015
Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. V/S Sarvjeet Yadav
Court Name: Barabanki
Appelant Advocate Surendra Kumar Mishra
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/6/2015( Date of Filing : 13 Jan 2015 )1. Sarvjeet YadavVillage-Telma, Post & Pargan-Dariyabad, Tehsil-Ramsanehighat, District-Barabanki BarabankiUP...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd.Ramsanehighat, BarabankiB...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2019
UTTAR PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LTD. V/S SMT. SUDHA RANI
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 45
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2015
Uttar Pradesh Government Through District Magistrate V/S Rajesh Studio & Video Film Maker Proprietor Rajesh Kumar Gupta
Court Name: Ghazipur
Appelant Advocate Shri Sada Nand Pathak
Respondant Advocate Shri Atma Yadav
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2017
UTTAR PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. V/S MITTAL FLOUR MILLS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JAWAHAR CHAWLA
Respondant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG & MR. UPENDRA MISHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 436 OF 20001. MITTAL FLOUR MILLSThrough Its Partner. Sh. Rajesh Mittal Village-Gangapur Pahari, PeerumadaraNainital-244714Uttrakhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UTTAR PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ...
Case Number: 436
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2000
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2014
EXEN Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board Electricity Distribution Division First V/S Rajesh Kumar Rai
Electricity Board Electricity Uttar Pradesh
Court Name: Ghazipur
Appelant Advocate Shri Ajay Rai
Respondant Advocate Shri Murli Manohar Sinha
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2017
UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVAM & ANR. V/S R.C. CHAUDHARY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVRAJ SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1794 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/12/2013 in Appeal No. 1824/1996 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. R.C. CHAUDHARYHIMVADI RESORTS, VILLAGE & POST OFFICE : KAUSANI, TEHSIL GARUR, DISTRICT :...
Case Number: 1794
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2014
M.Y. DUBEY V/S UTTAR PRADESH AVAS VIKAS PARISHAD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VISHNU SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 462 OF 2014 IN RP/536/20111. UTTAR PRADESH AVAS VIKAS PARISHAD...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M.Y. DUBEY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBERHON...
Case Number: 462
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-11-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uttar Pradesh in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uttar Pradesh ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uttar Pradesh under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.