company-name-logo

Uttar Pradesh

Latest Judgments

Total 840 Consumer Court Cases Against Uttar Pradesh.

Uttar Pradesh

The Employees Provident Funds Scheme Dvara Ayukt Uttar Pradesh & ETC V/S DHAN PRASAD

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Jalaun

Appelant Advocate RAHUL DUBEY

Respondant Advocate

वादी ने परिवाद पत्र को प्रेस नही किया प्रेस न किये जाने के कारण परिवाद पत्र निरस्त किया जाता है...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 15-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 14-09-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation V/S Sheela Memorial Hospital

Hospital   Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Subhash Vidyarthi

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/287/2017InComplaint Case No. C/2010/141. Sheela Memorial HospitalLucknow...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Uttar Pradesh Financial Corp...

Case Number: 287

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2017

NCDRC

AMIT BANKA V/S UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VISHNU SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. SARVESH KUMAR SHARMA & MR. RITESH KHARE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3278 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 02/09/2015 in Appeal No. 1147/2014 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHADTHROUGH ITS HOUSING COMMISSIONER 104, MAHATMA GAND...

Case Number: 3278

|

Date of Filing: 28-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 01-09-2017

NCDRC

UTTAR PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. V/S SUHAIL SHAMSI

Electricity Board   Electricity   Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PAWAN KUMAR RAY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2964 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 07/01/2016 in Appeal No. 2242/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SUHAIL SHAMSIS/O. ZUBAIR SHAMSI, R/O. NEAR SURAJ CINEMA CIVIL LINES RAMPURUTTAR PRADESH....

Case Number: 2964

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2017

Uttar Pradesh

uttar pradesh Baroda regional rural bank V/S Jai Prakash Singh

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Sultanpur

Appelant Advocate Komal Singh

Respondant Advocate P.P.Srivastva

Case Number: 268

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 16-08-2017

Uttar Pradesh

UTTAR PRADESH VIKAS PARISHAD V/S AVNISH YADAV

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate TEJ SINGH YADAV

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 317

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 12-01-2018

Andhra Pradesh

The Managing Director, Samsung India Electronics Pvt., Ltd., Uttar Pradesh V/S Nekkanti Srinivas

Samsung   Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: East Godavari

Appelant Advocate Vegulla Venkata Ramana Murthy

Respondant Advocate V.J.S

Case Number: 24

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2017

Uttar Pradesh

UTTAR PRADESH SHAKARI GRAM VIKASH BANK V/S BHOLA RAM

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Agra-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 24-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 04-06-2022

Uttar Pradesh

UTTAR PRADESH AWAS VIKAS PARISHAD V/S MR. VIKAS SHARMA

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 166

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 15-07-2017

Uttar Pradesh

UTTAR PRADESH AVAS VIKAS V/S AKHIL TOMAR

Uttar Pradesh  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate SANJEEV SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/56/20161. AKHIL TOMARF-2, RENBOW APARTMENT A-3, RAMPURI GHAZIABAD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UTTAR PRADESH AVAS VIKAS OFFICE- HALL NO-S-1,SECTOR -16 A VASUDHRA COMPLEX GHAZIABAD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI HA...

Case Number: 56

|

Date of Filing: 16-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-07-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uttar Pradesh in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uttar Pradesh ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Uttar Pradesh under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.