Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:292 of 2017Date of Institution:28.11.2017Date of Decision:30.11.2017Chitkara University having its Administrative Office at Saraswati Kendra, SCO 160-161, Sector 9, Chandigarh, through its Registrar.…&...
Case Number: 292
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2017
Court Name: Nizamabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate B.Satyanarayana Goud
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D.K. MALHOTRA & RAJESH MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2415 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/04/2011 in Appeal No. 518/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. THAPAR UNIVERSITYThrough it RegistrarPatialaPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. YUVRAJ ANEJAS...
Case Number: 2415
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D.K. MALHOTRA & RAJESH MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate MR YOGESH MALHOTRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2415 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/04/2011 in Appeal No. 518/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. THAPAR UNIVERSITYThrough it RegistrarPatialaPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. YUVRAJ ANEJAS...
Case Number: 2416
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D.K. MALHOTRA & MR. RAJESH MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2415 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/04/2011 in Appeal No. 518/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. THAPAR UNIVERSITYThrough it RegistrarPatialaPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. YUVRAJ ANEJAS...
Case Number: 2746
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D.K. MALHOTRA & MR. RAJESH MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJIV KATARIA & MS. DEBJANI DAS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2415 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/04/2011 in Appeal No. 518/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. THAPAR UNIVERSITYThrough it RegistrarPatialaPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. YUVRAJ ANEJAS...
Case Number: 2747
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D.K. MALHOTRA & MR. RAJESH MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2415 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/04/2011 in Appeal No. 518/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. THAPAR UNIVERSITYThrough it RegistrarPatialaPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. YUVRAJ ANEJAS...
Case Number: 2748
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D.K. MALHOTRA & MR. RAJESH MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate MR. PARINAV GUPTA & MR. EKLAVYA GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2415 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/04/2011 in Appeal No. 518/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. THAPAR UNIVERSITYThrough it RegistrarPatialaPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. YUVRAJ ANEJAS...
Case Number: 2749
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate R.K.DAVE
Respondant Advocate S.K.Srivastav&co. Advocates
Addl. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban DistrictAdmin Bldg., 3rd floor, Nr. Chetana College, Bandra-East, Mumbai-51Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/11/4361. MR YASH V. SHAH16, GURU PRASAD BUILDING, 41, GARODIA NAGAR, MUMBAI-77............Complainant(s)Versus1. DIRECTOR,...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2018
Court Name: Churu
Appelant Advocate RRP
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.