company-name-logo

University

Latest Judgments

Total 1728 Consumer Court Cases Against University.

Uttar Pradesh

President/Manager Galgotias University Uttar Pradesh, School Of Engineering & Technology V/S Vivek Kumar Yadav

University   School   Galgotias University  

Court Name: Ghazipur

Appelant Advocate Shri Satya Prakash Shrivastava

Respondant Advocate Shri Devendra Kumar Rai

Case Number: 92

|

Date of Filing: 21-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 06-02-2018

Chhattisgarh

Mats University V/S Ku Madhurima Singh

University  

Court Name: Rajnandgaon

Appelant Advocate Shri M L Sahu

Respondant Advocate Shri R K Gomasta

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-02-2018

Madhya Pradesh

THE REGISTRAR, AMITY UNIVERSITY V/S KU.RITIKA CHOUHAN

University   Amity University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH. R.K. DHOTE

Respondant Advocate SH. S.M. QAZI

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 05-02-2018

Tamil Nadu

Manonmaniam Sundaranar University Directorate of Distance Education Through its In-Charge V/S A.Narayana Raj

University   Education  

Court Name: Thoothukkudi

Appelant Advocate TR.K.JEYAKUMAR

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 67

|

Date of Filing: 27-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2018

Tamil Nadu

Manonmaniam Sundaranar University Directorate of Distance Education Through its In-Charge V/S M.Mariselvam

University   Education  

Court Name: Thoothukkudi

Appelant Advocate TR.K.JEYAKUMAR

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 70

|

Date of Filing: 27-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2018

Uttarakhand

H.N.B. Garhwal University & Others V/S Dharm Singh

University  

Court Name: Hardwar

Appelant Advocate Man Mohan

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 42

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-01-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Meenakshi Sharma V/S Rai University

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A N Tripathi

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2007/2649(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Rai University A...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Meenakshi SharmaA...........Respon...

Case Number: 2007

|

Date of Filing: 06-12-2007

|

Date of Upload: 09-02-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Ms Shelly Chauhan V/S Rai University

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A.M. tirpadhi

Respondant Advocate R K Gupta

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2007/810(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Rai UniversityA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ms Shelly ChauhanA.....

Case Number: 2007

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2007

|

Date of Upload: 09-02-2018

NCDRC

KUMARI PARIDHI GUPTA & ANR. V/S MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY & 2 ORS.

University  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. TARUN GUPTA

Respondant Advocate MS. VIZZY AGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 195 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 02/11/2016 in Appeal No. 166/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR,ROHTAKHARYANA2. LAW AND MANAGEMENT ...

Case Number: 195

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2018

NCDRC

MR. SAMAN MARWARI V/S THAPAR UNIVERSITY

University  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. D.K. MALHOTRA & RAJESH MALHOTRA

Respondant Advocate MR YOGESH MALHOTRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 263 OF 2017 IN RP/2416/20111. THAPAR UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MR. SAMAN MARWARI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. PREM NARAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER For the Appellant : Fo...

Case Number: 263

|

Date of Filing: 28-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 02-02-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.