University
Latest Judgments
Total 1729 Consumer Court Cases Against University.
Vijay Kumar V/S Indira Gandhi National Open University
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Raghubir Tejpal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:162 of 2018Date of Institution:07.06.2018Date of Decision:15.11.20181. Regional Office (IGNOU) Sector 14, Panchkula.Regional Centre: Chandigarh through its Director.2. Indira Gandhi National Open University, ...
Case Number: 162
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2018
Vinod Kumar Sharma s/o Radhey Shyam Sharma V/S Registrar Niims University
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Aditya Mitruka
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 341/2018Registrar, NIMS University, Shobha Nagar, Delhi Road, Jaipur & ors.Vs.Vinod Kumar Sharma s/o Radheyshtan Sharma r/o Plot No. C-705, Budh Vihar, Alwar. Raj. Date of Order 13.1...
Case Number: 341
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2018
Ajay Parbhakar V/S Chitkara University
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the parties that directions given by the Forum in judgment under challenge dated 26.03.2018 at (i) & (ii), which reads thus, stood complied with and the appellant/University will not adopt any such like practice in future :-“i. To immediately...
Case Number: 105
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2018
Sri Sai University V/S Akshay Parkash
Court Name: Kangra
Appelant Advocate Sh. Anuj Soni
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2018
Smt. Kamla Jangpangi V/S Indira Gandhi National Open University
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Shashank Pandey
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND176 Ajabpur Kalan,Mothrowala Road, Dehradun-248121Final OrderFirst Appeal No. A/16/43( Date of Filing : 29 Feb 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/01/2016 in Case No. 292/2012 of District Dehradun)1. Indira Gandhi National O...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2018
Controller of Examinations, Panjab University V/S Bhartendu Sood
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
The complainant has appended a note on the complaint that he withdraws the same. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the appropriate Authority/ Co...
Case Number: 589
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2018
MAHARSHI DAYANAND SARASWATI UNIVERSITY AJMER V/S PUSPENDRA SINGH
Court Name: Dhaulpur
Appelant Advocate ATUL KUMAR BHARGAVA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 312
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2018
University Of Petrolium &Energy V/S Rajkumar Ghosh
Court Name: Dehradun
Appelant Advocate S.K Sarin
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
University of Kota, Dean V/S Amrin khan
Court Name: Kota
Appelant Advocate Iqbal hussain
Respondant Advocate Narendra kumar sharma
Case Number: 293
|
Date of Filing: 12-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2018
Kamal Kumar Manjhani V/S Amity University U.P.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Aishwarya Pratap Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1787/2016( Date of Filing : 09 Sep 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/04/2016 in Case No. C/340/2015 of District Gorakhpur)1. Amity University U....
Case Number: 1787
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.