company-name-logo

University

Latest Judgments

Total 1728 Consumer Court Cases Against University.

Chandigarh

G.P.Bansal V/S Vice-Chancellor, Panjab University

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. B.L.Gupta

Respondant Advocate

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 676 of 2009 1. Vice-Chancellor, Panjab UniversityChandigarh2. The RegistrarPanjab University, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)V...

Case Number: 676

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY & ANR. V/S USHA RANI

University   Kurukshetra University  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DINESH KUMAR JANGRA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 64 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 24/09/2009 in Appeal No. 1840/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. USHA RANIResident of House No. 1164, Durga Colony, Chhoti Line Jagdhari Yamana Nagar ..............

Case Number: 64

|

Date of Filing: 07-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 04-02-2010

Karnataka

The Registrar, Kuvempu University V/S Akshata Ajit Shetty

University  

Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional

Appelant Advocate IP

Respondant Advocate

IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. CC/2668/2009 Akshata Ajit Shetty ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Registrar, Kuvempu University Sri Sai College, Study Cent...

Case Number: 2668

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MAHARISHI DAYANANAD UNIVERSITY V/S N.D. SHARMA

University  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MR. TARUN GUPTAI

Date of Filing: 11 Nov 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4128/2009(Against the Order dated 24/09/2009 in Appeal No. 2575/2003 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. N.D. SHARMA166/5, R.K.Puram New Delhi ...........Appellant(s)...

Case Number: 4128

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 01-02-2010

Gujarat

South Gujarat University V/S Amulkumar H. Soalnki

University  

Court Name: Valsad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 05-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2020

Maharashtra

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 01-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 13-10-2018

Karnataka

The Registrar of Manipal University V/S Sri. Dr.Sushith

University  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate D.Ishwara Bhat

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 84

|

Date of Filing: 08-04-2009

|

Date of Upload: 17-05-2019

Chandigarh

The Vice Chancellor Panjab University V/S Sh. G.P. Bansal

University  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 257 of 2009 1. Sh. G.P. Bansalchd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Vice Chancellor Panjab Universitychd. ...........Respondent(s) ...

Case Number: 257

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

The Director, Kuvempu University V/S Vidhya Pai K.

University  

Court Name: Udupi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 42

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2020

Punjab

Babe Ke Off Compus University Educational Centre V/S Sukhdeep Kaur

University  

Court Name: Moga

Appelant Advocate Sh.Jupinder Singh Sidhu,Adv.

Respondant Advocate

distt.consumer mogadistrict consumer forum,mogaconsumer case(CC) No. CC/09/206 Sukhdeep Kaur ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Babe Ke Off Compus University Educational CentreBabe Ke B.Ed CollegeShri Rawatpura Sarkar International University ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Jagmohan Si...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 16-10-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.