Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2865 OF 2010(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission None)1. S. LILAVATHI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. REGISTRAR, PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEF...
Case Number: 2865
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2010
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCC NO. 279 Of 2010 1. MIDHUN KUMAR ATHADIMANAGING PARTNER,DIGITAL INNOVATIONS ,ATHADI BUILDINGS,MANKAVU PO,KALOOR ROADKOZHIKODE ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. THE DIRECTOR,DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION ,ANNA UNIVERSITYVEERAPA...
Case Number: 279
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CDRF TVMCDRF ThiruvananthapuramExecution Application No. EA/10/45 1. A.S DinakaranKodungalloor, Thrissur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. The Vice Chancellor, Kerala Agriculture UniversityKavu P.O , Thrissur2. Dr SaradammaProfessor of Entomology, College of Agriculture,VellayaniT...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Puneet Kumar Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh.V.M. Gupta
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 225 1. Saman MarwariH.No.2076/2, Sector 45-C, Chandigarh-160047PatialaPunjab ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Director, Thapar UniversityThapar University PatialaPatial...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sachin Gupta
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 17 of 2010 1. Chandanson Sh. Pawan Kumar, Resident of House No. 82, GH-I, HEWO-1, Mansa Devi Complex -5, Panchkula ...........App...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/515 Dr.B.S.Narakesari ...........Appellant(s)Vs.University of Mysore. ...........R...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 72 of 2010 1. Panjab UniversityCHd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Gurdeep SinghChd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For th...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMComplaint Case No. CC/09/476 1. MIDHUN KUMAR ATHADIMANAGING PARTNER,DIGITAL INNOVATION,ATHADI BUILDINGS,PO MANKAVU,KALOOR ROAD,KOZHIKODEKOZHIKODEKerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. THE DIRECTOR,DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION,ANNAMA...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMComplaint Case No. 66/2006 1. K.SHINJITH VAISHAKH,MALADATHUTHAZHAM,KOTTOOLI,CLT. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THENJIPPALAM,MALAPPURAM. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., ,PRE...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate S.Hemachandra
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN,Ph:22352624 No:8, 7th floor, Sahakara bhavan, Cunningham road, Bangalore- 560052. consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/1301 Dr.A.S.Parashiva Murthy ...........Appellant(s)Vs.University of Agricultural S...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.