Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate Adv.Balachandran
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/1911. K.Sivasankaran Nair,.Sathy Bhavan,TC-10/1347,Vattiyoorkkavu,TvpmKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vinayaka mission UniversitySalem, Tamil NaduKerala2. MDVinayaka mission University,Salem,TNThiruvananthapuramKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFOR...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate Adv.Balachandran
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/1921. Dr.Rajan Simon JamesTC 4/49,Kowadiar PO,TvpmKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vinayaka mission UniversitySeam,Tamil NaduKerala2. MDVinayaka Mission UTY,TNThiruvananthapuramKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Sri G. Sivaprasad PRESIDENT Smt....
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate Adv.Balachandran
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/1931. N.BalagopalSarika,Elanjimoodu,KumarapuramKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vinayaka mission UniversitySalem,TNKerala2. MDVinaya ka mission UTY,Salem TNThiruvananthapuramKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Sri G. Sivaprasad PRESIDENT Smt. S....
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL HOODA
Respondant Advocate MR. ASHISH KUMAR & PANKAJ SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3353 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 27/03/2009 in Appeal No. 3142,3404/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SHELLY SACHDEVAD/o.Sh. Chander Sachdeva R/o. House. No. 51. New Kamla Nagar. Yamuna Nagar...
Case Number: 3353
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Tom Joseph
Respondant Advocate Hari Sharma
First Appeal No. 236/2007(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Dhanoop N NairMattappillil House,Chocaud,Malappuram BEFORE: Sri.M.V.VISWANATHAN PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERKERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURA...
Case Number: 236
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 855 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/02/2011 in Appeal No. 188/2010 of the State Commission Pondicherry)1. S. LILAVATHI23, Bharathiyar Salai, Ashok Nagar, LawspetPondicherry - 605008...........Petiti...
Case Number: 855
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI TRANSFER APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 20111. S. LILAVATHI23, Bharathiya Salai, Ashok Nagar, LawspetPondicherry - 605008...........Appellants(s)Versus1. REGISTRAR, PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY & ANR.Pondicherry - 6050142. DR. D. SAKTHIGA...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2011
Court Name: Chhatarpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2016
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Yogesh kumar Singla
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/84 1. Aman Goyalson of Jagdish Goyal son of Ram rakha Goyal H.No.30390 st.No.3,Paras...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate MSKP
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/161/2010( Date of Filing : 21 May 2010 )1. Kumari Anushree B. ShettyAged about 17 years, Do. M.Balakrishna Shetty, A minor represented by her father and natural guardian Mr.M.Ba...
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.