Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KULDEEP MANSUKHANI LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. AJNEESH RAJ TAKKAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3848 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 03/08/2010 in Appeal No. 1796/2009 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. SANDEEP PAL SINGHR/o. New Dashmesh NagarMogaPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. PUNJAB A...
Case Number: 3848
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.Anand Chhibbar, Adv. for the appellants
Respondant Advocate Sh.Mohit Jaggi, Adv. for the respondent
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 38 of 2011 1. The ICFAI UniversityDehradun, Village Bhawala, Near Saila Khui, Industrial Area, Paonta Sahib Road, District Dehrad...
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.Anand Chibbar, Adv. for the appellants
Respondant Advocate Sh.Mohit Jaggi, Adv. for the respondent
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 39 of 2011 1. The ICFAI UniversityDehradun, Village Bhawala, Near Saila Khui, Industrial Area, Paonta Sahib Road, District Dehrad...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT.N(P) ANJANA DEVI
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/900/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Krishna at Vijaywada)1. M/S GITAM INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS, GITAM UNIVERSITY REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR PRO.V.K.KUMARGANDHINAGAR CAMPUS, RUSHI KONDA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 045.VISAKHAPATNAMAndhra Pr...
Case Number: 900
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V. SRIDHAR REDDY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2079 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 24/08/2010 in Appeal No. 4040/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. S. SRI LAKSHMI KUMARIR/o Bramarambapuram, krishnalanka,VijayawadaAndhara Pradesh2. The ...
Case Number: 2079
|
Date of Filing: 14-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Sanjay Piperwall
Respondant Advocate M/s D.K. Lal and N. Krishna
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1238 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/02/2011 in Appeal No. 9/2007 of the State Commission Pondicherry)1. S. LILAVATHIMrs S. lilawati, 23 bhartiyar salai, asjhok nagar, lawspetpondichery-605008.........
Case Number: 1238
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1238 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/02/2011 in Appeal No. 9/2007 of the State Commission Pondicherry)1. S. LILAVATHIMrs S. lilawati, 23 bhartiyar salai, asjhok nagar, lawspetpondichery-605008.........
Case Number: 2865
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2011
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/849/2011( Date of Filing : 02 May 2011 )1. Kiran Kumar P............Complainant(s)Versus...
Case Number: 849
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. KIRAN SURI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1341 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/12/2010 in Appeal No. 4746/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. REGISTRAR, BANGALORE UNIVERSITY & ANR.Jnana Bharathi CampusBangalore - 560054Karnataka2. THE...
Case Number: 1341
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.