Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV M DALVI
Respondant Advocate --
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/772(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/05/2010 in Case No. 50/08 of District Pune)1. RAI UNIVERSITYO/AT A- 41 MCIE MATHURA ROAD NEW DELHIDELHI DELHI2. MR VINAY RAICHAIRMAN RAI UNIV...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV M DALVI
Respondant Advocate --
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/772(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/05/2010 in Case No. 50/08 of District Pune)1. RAI UNIVERSITYO/AT A- 41 MCIE MATHURA ROAD NEW DELHIDELHI DELHI2. MR VINAY RAICHAIRMAN RAI UNIV...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 399 of 2010 1. Panjab UniversitySector-14 Chandigarh through its Registrar ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. EM PEE Motors Ltd.Pioneer Toyota 177/1 Industrial Area, Phase-I, Chandigarh2. Toyota Kirlokar Motor 24,Vithal Mally...
Case Number: 399
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 187 of 2011 1. J.S. Rathor S/o Late Dr. B. S. Rathor R/o T-II/13, Sector-25, Panjab University Campus,Chandigarh Ph.5192872. ...........Appellant(s...
Case Number: 187
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate Sandip Jadhav
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLHAPURCentral Administrative Building, South Side, Second Floor, Kasaba Bawada Road, Kolhapur.Phone No. 0231-2651327, Fax No. 0231-2651127Email- confo-ko-mh@nic.in, Website- www.confonet.nic.in Complaint Case No. CC/12/371. Dr.Shripal...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJOY KUMAR GHOSH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2157 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 31/03/2011 in Appeal No. 340/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DR. MADAN C. PAUL54, DAKSHINPURRAM, JNUNEW DELHI-110067DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. CENT...
Case Number: 2157
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A.V.PATWARDHAN
Respondant Advocate .
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/875(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/05/2009 in Case No. 594/2008 of District Kolhapur)1. SHIVAJI UNIVERSITYKOLHAPURKOLHAPURMaharastra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MR YOGESH AN...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 478 of 2010 1. Arvind KaurW/o Sh. Raj Kumar, R/o HOuse No. 2050 Sector-66, SAS nagar Mohali (Punjab) ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Swami Vivekanand Universityof Merchant Navy(Now Merchant Navy Officer Academy) SCO 323-32...
Case Number: 478
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gurpreet Singh Saini
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 25 of 2011 1. Harjit SinghR/o 4843/a, Extn-8, sunny Enclave, Kharar-140301. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. ICFAI University Centre SCO 375-376, Ist F...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R S Kalkura
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/795(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/05/2011 in Case No. CC/08/624 of District Trissur)1. The Deputy Registrar,Calicut UniversityPareeksha Bhavan,ThanjipalamKerala...........Appell...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.